volume 78 issue 6 pages 1503-1519

FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2009-12-09
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR1.400
CiteScore7.2
Impact factor2.8
ISSN08873585, 10970134
PubMed ID:  20077569
Biochemistry
Molecular Biology
Structural Biology
Abstract
Upon binding, proteins undergo conformational changes. These changes often prevent rigid-body docking methods from predicting the 3D structure of a complex from the unbound conformations of its proteins. Handling protein backbone flexibility is a major challenge for docking methodologies, as backbone flexibility adds a huge number of degrees of freedom to the search space, and therefore considerably increases the running time of docking algorithms. Normal mode analysis permits description of protein flexibility as a linear combination of discrete movements (modes). Low-frequency modes usually describe the large-scale conformational changes of the protein. Therefore, many docking methods model backbone flexibility by using only few modes, which have the lowest frequencies. However, studies show that due to molecular interactions, many proteins also undergo local and small-scale conformational changes, which are described by high-frequency normal modes. Here we present a new method, FiberDock, for docking refinement which models backbone flexibility by an unlimited number of normal modes. The method iteratively minimizes the structure of the flexible protein along the most relevant modes. The relevance of a mode is calculated according to the correlation between the chemical forces, applied on each atom, and the translation vector of each atom, according to the normal mode. The results show that the method successfully models backbone movements that occur during molecular interactions and considerably improves the accuracy and the ranking of rigid-docking models of protein-protein complexes. A web server for the FiberDock method is available at: http://bioinfo3d.cs.tau.ac.il/FiberDock.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
13 publications, 8.39%
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
10 publications, 6.45%
Methods in Molecular Biology
7 publications, 4.52%
Bioinformatics
6 publications, 3.87%
BMC Bioinformatics
5 publications, 3.23%
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
5 publications, 3.23%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
5 publications, 3.23%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
4 publications, 2.58%
PLoS ONE
4 publications, 2.58%
PLoS Computational Biology
4 publications, 2.58%
Structure
3 publications, 1.94%
Drug Discovery Today
3 publications, 1.94%
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
3 publications, 1.94%
Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
2 publications, 1.29%
Scientific Reports
2 publications, 1.29%
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
2 publications, 1.29%
Biophysical Journal
2 publications, 1.29%
Food Research International
2 publications, 1.29%
Protein Science
2 publications, 1.29%
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
2 publications, 1.29%
Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology
2 publications, 1.29%
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry
1 publication, 0.65%
Journal of Computational Biology
1 publication, 0.65%
Molecules
1 publication, 0.65%
Viruses
1 publication, 0.65%
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
1 publication, 0.65%
Journal of Molecular Modeling
1 publication, 0.65%
BMC Microbiology
1 publication, 0.65%
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
1 publication, 0.65%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Elsevier
42 publications, 27.1%
Springer Nature
24 publications, 15.48%
Wiley
23 publications, 14.84%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
20 publications, 12.9%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
8 publications, 5.16%
MDPI
7 publications, 4.52%
Oxford University Press
7 publications, 4.52%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
7 publications, 4.52%
IGI Global
4 publications, 2.58%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3 publications, 1.94%
World Scientific
2 publications, 1.29%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 1.29%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 0.65%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.65%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 0.65%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 0.65%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 0.65%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
156
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Mashiach E. et al. FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking // Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics. 2009. Vol. 78. No. 6. pp. 1503-1519.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Mashiach E., Nussinov R., Wolfson H. J. FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking // Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics. 2009. Vol. 78. No. 6. pp. 1503-1519.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1002/prot.22668
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22668
TI - FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking
T2 - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
AU - Mashiach, Efrat
AU - Nussinov, Ruth
AU - Wolfson, Haim J.
PY - 2009
DA - 2009/12/09
PB - Wiley
SP - 1503-1519
IS - 6
VL - 78
PMID - 20077569
SN - 0887-3585
SN - 1097-0134
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2009_Mashiach,
author = {Efrat Mashiach and Ruth Nussinov and Haim J. Wolfson},
title = {FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking},
journal = {Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics},
year = {2009},
volume = {78},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22668},
number = {6},
pages = {1503--1519},
doi = {10.1002/prot.22668}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Mashiach, Efrat, et al. “FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking.” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 78, no. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 1503-1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22668.