volume 191 issue 1 pages 1-7

Telepathology: a diagnostic tool for the millennium?

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2000-05-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.160
CiteScore11.0
Impact factor5.2
ISSN00223417, 10969896
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Abstract
Many developments in science have their origins in science fiction and telepathology is no exception. The concept was first illustrated in 1924 in the magazine 'Radio News'. It was not until 1980, however, that the first working telepathology system was demonstrated. Although the system was shown to work, it required special hardware, dedicated software and special microwave transmission links to be installed. Little interest was shown worldwide because of the very high cost and the inability of many people to replicate such a system. Ten years later, the personal computer (PC) was able to provide more than adequate performance at low cost for both image display quality and speed, and the development of video technology had resulted in high quality images being produced by television cameras that were now easily affordable. Microscopes were also relatively cheaper. Thus, by 1993 or 1994, all the hardware necessary to produce a telepathology system was available at reasonable cost. Telepathology can now be used for remote primary diagnosis, remote referral to a specialist pathologist, remote teaching, remote presentation of post-mortem or microscopic findings, quality assurance image circulation and feedback, and consensus diagnosis for pathological review in clinical trials. There are two residual problems. The first concerns the speed of data transmission, commonly referred to as the bandwidth. The second is that the software provided by most of the manufacturers and suppliers of these systems is not entirely suitable to the task and the systems are not interoperable. It is clear that the approach of the manufacturers is at present unlikely to produce telepathology systems which pathologists feel comfortable in using. A somewhat different approach is illustrated by the accompanying article in this issue from the Berlin group, where a relatively simple Java-based applet and the Internet are used to allow single or multiple users to view slides on a robotic microscope. This could form the basis for a truly useful system, but still needs modification for some applications.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Human Pathology
5 publications, 9.43%
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
4 publications, 7.55%
Journal of Pathology
3 publications, 5.66%
Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
2 publications, 3.77%
Dermatologic Surgery
2 publications, 3.77%
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
2 publications, 3.77%
Diagnostic Pathology
2 publications, 3.77%
Journal of Pathology Informatics
2 publications, 3.77%
Histopathology
2 publications, 3.77%
SpringerBriefs in Computer Science
2 publications, 3.77%
International Congress Series
1 publication, 1.89%
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Medical Internet Research
1 publication, 1.89%
International Journal of Surgical Pathology
1 publication, 1.89%
Pathology and Oncology Research
1 publication, 1.89%
Modern Pathology
1 publication, 1.89%
Surgical Pathology Clinics
1 publication, 1.89%
Computers in Biology and Medicine
1 publication, 1.89%
Diagnostic Cytopathology
1 publication, 1.89%
Clinical Transplantation
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
1 publication, 1.89%
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
1 publication, 1.89%
APMIS
1 publication, 1.89%
American Surgeon
1 publication, 1.89%
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
1 publication, 1.89%
Electrical, Control and Communication Engineering
1 publication, 1.89%
Neuromethods
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Clinical Pathology
1 publication, 1.89%
Apollo Medicine
1 publication, 1.89%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
Elsevier
11 publications, 20.75%
Wiley
11 publications, 20.75%
Springer Nature
7 publications, 13.21%
Mary Ann Liebert
4 publications, 7.55%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
4 publications, 7.55%
SAGE
4 publications, 7.55%
JMIR Publications
1 publication, 1.89%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 1.89%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 1.89%
BMJ
1 publication, 1.89%
Medknow
1 publication, 1.89%
MDPI
1 publication, 1.89%
2
4
6
8
10
12
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
53
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Wells C. A., Sowter C. Telepathology: a diagnostic tool for the millennium? // Journal of Pathology. 2000. Vol. 191. No. 1. pp. 1-7.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Wells C. A., Sowter C. Telepathology: a diagnostic tool for the millennium? // Journal of Pathology. 2000. Vol. 191. No. 1. pp. 1-7.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(200005)191:1<1::aid-path624>3.0.co;2-s
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(200005)191:1<1::aid-path624>3.0.co;2-s
TI - Telepathology: a diagnostic tool for the millennium?
T2 - Journal of Pathology
AU - Wells, C. A.
AU - Sowter, C
PY - 2000
DA - 2000/05/01
PB - Wiley
SP - 1-7
IS - 1
VL - 191
PMID - 10767711
SN - 0022-3417
SN - 1096-9896
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2000_Wells,
author = {C. A. Wells and C Sowter},
title = {Telepathology: a diagnostic tool for the millennium?},
journal = {Journal of Pathology},
year = {2000},
volume = {191},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(200005)191:1<1::aid-path624>3.0.co;2-s},
number = {1},
pages = {1--7},
doi = {10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(200005)191:1<1::aid-path624>3.0.co;2-s}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Wells, C. A., and C Sowter. “Telepathology: a diagnostic tool for the millennium?.” Journal of Pathology, vol. 191, no. 1, May. 2000, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(200005)191:1<1::aid-path624>3.0.co;2-s.