volume 66 issue 1

Comparing algorithms for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized trials

Sophie Sun 1
Konstantinos Sechidis 2
Yao Chen 1
Jiarui Lu 1
Chong Ma 3
Ardalan Mirshani 1
David Ohlssen 1
Marc Vandemeulebroecke 4
Björn Bornkamp 2
1
 
Advanced Methodology and Data Science Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation East Hanover New Jersey USA
2
 
Advanced Methodology and Data Science Novartis Pharma AG Basel Switzerland
3
 
Early Development Analytics Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Cambridge Massachusetts USA
4
 
Clinical Development and Analytics Novartis Pharma AG Basel Switzerland
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-11-27
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.968
CiteScore3.1
Impact factor1.8
ISSN03233847, 15214036
General Medicine
Statistics and Probability
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Abstract
The identification and estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects in biomedical clinical trials are challenging, because trials are typically planned to assess the treatment effect in the overall trial population. Nevertheless, the identification of how the treatment effect may vary across subgroups is of major importance for drug development. In this work, we review some existing simulation work and perform a simulation study to evaluate recent methods for identifying and estimating the heterogeneous treatments effects using various metrics and scenarios relevant for drug development. Our focus is not only on a comparison of the methods in general, but on how well these methods perform in simulation scenarios that reflect real clinical trials. We provide the R package benchtm that can be used to simulate synthetic biomarker distributions based on real clinical trial data and to create interpretable scenarios to benchmark methods for identification and estimation of treatment effect heterogeneity.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
Statistics in Medicine
3 publications, 42.86%
Pharmaceutical Statistics
2 publications, 28.57%
Biomedicines
1 publication, 14.29%
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2
3

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
Wiley
5 publications, 71.43%
MDPI
1 publication, 14.29%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2
3
4
5
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
7
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Sun S. et al. Comparing algorithms for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized trials // Biometrical Journal. 2022. Vol. 66. No. 1.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Sun S., Sechidis K., Chen Y., Lu J., Ma C., Mirshani A., Ohlssen D., Vandemeulebroecke M., Bornkamp B. Comparing algorithms for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized trials // Biometrical Journal. 2022. Vol. 66. No. 1.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1002/bimj.202100337
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.202100337
TI - Comparing algorithms for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized trials
T2 - Biometrical Journal
AU - Sun, Sophie
AU - Sechidis, Konstantinos
AU - Chen, Yao
AU - Lu, Jiarui
AU - Ma, Chong
AU - Mirshani, Ardalan
AU - Ohlssen, David
AU - Vandemeulebroecke, Marc
AU - Bornkamp, Björn
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/11/27
PB - Wiley
IS - 1
VL - 66
PMID - 36437036
SN - 0323-3847
SN - 1521-4036
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Sun,
author = {Sophie Sun and Konstantinos Sechidis and Yao Chen and Jiarui Lu and Chong Ma and Ardalan Mirshani and David Ohlssen and Marc Vandemeulebroecke and Björn Bornkamp},
title = {Comparing algorithms for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized trials},
journal = {Biometrical Journal},
year = {2022},
volume = {66},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.202100337},
number = {1},
doi = {10.1002/bimj.202100337}
}