Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, volume 33, issue 8, pages 903-927

A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings

A. Chopra 1
Rakesh K. Goel 2
2
 
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cal Poly State University, Room 263, Building 13, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, U.S.A.
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2004-06-11
scimago Q1
SJR1.524
CiteScore7.2
Impact factor4.3
ISSN00988847, 10969845
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Abstract
An Erratum has been published for this article in Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn. 2004; 33:1429. Based on structural dynamics theory, the modal pushover analysis (MPA) procedure retains the conceptual simplicity of current procedures with invariant force distribution, now common in structural engineering practice. The MPA procedure for estimating seismic demands is extended to unsymmetric-plan buildings. In the MPA procedure, the seismic demand due to individual terms in the modal expansion of the effective earthquake forces is determined by non-linear static analysis using the inertia force distribution for each mode, which for unsymmetric buildings includes two lateral forces and torque at each floor level. These ‘modal’ demands due to the first few terms of the modal expansion are then combined by the CQC rule to obtain an estimate of the total seismic demand for inelastic systems. When applied to elastic systems, the MPA procedure is equivalent to standard response spectrum analysis (RSA). The MPA estimates of seismic demand for torsionally-stiff and torsionally-flexible unsymmetric systems are shown to be similarly accurate as they are for the symmetric building; however, the results deteriorate for a torsionally-similarly-stiff unsymmetric-plan system and the ground motion considered because (a) elastic modes are strongly coupled, and (b) roof displacement is underestimated by the CQC modal combination rule (which would also limit accuracy of RSA for linearly elastic systems). Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
5
10
15
20
25
30
35

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?