Open Access
Open access
Learning Health Systems

Academically based regional quality improvement hubs: Advancing Medicaid's quality strategy in the state of Ohio through state‐academic partnerships

Dushka Crane 1
MARY APPLEGATE 2
Gilbert Liu 1
Allison Lorenz 1
Shari Bolen 3
Christopher R Jordan 4
Melissa Mccoy 5
Jon Barley 2
Yan Yuan 2
Katie Jenkins 1
Melissa Nance 2
Amber Waweru 2
Jayne Kubiak 1
Caitlin Lorincz 1
Doug Spence 1
Show full list: 15 authors
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-01-07
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR1.084
CiteScore5.6
Impact factor2.6
ISSN23796146
Abstract
Introduction

In 2022, the Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) launched a Managed Care Population Health and Quality Strategy to improve healthcare quality and equity for Medicaid Managed Care enrollees. Aligned with national quality objectives, the strategy focuses on personalized care, service coordination for complex needs, reducing health disparities, and includes performance incentives for Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) and innovative provider payment models. While Ohio has made progress in quality improvement, challenges remain in addressing statewide health indicators and disparities and helping healthcare providers adapt to performance‐based models. This report outlines a new approach that builds on Ohio's partnership with six colleges of medicine (CoMs) to support provider organizations and engage stakeholders in quality improvement (QI).

Methods

ODM established Regional QI Hubs within Ohio's CoMs to advance population health initiatives using the Model for Improvement developed by the Associate in Process Improvement. These academically based hubs collaborate with local healthcare clinics, community partners, and payers on QI projects to enhance care, reduce disparities, and strengthen health systems. By engaging stakeholders in designing and testing change ideas using Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act cycles and electronic health record data feedback, QI Hubs further the goals of the learning health system.

Results

Key lessons highlight the benefits of engaging academic institutions to build internal QI capacity and promote health equity. The model required substantial capacity building and commitment on behalf of academic institutions and strengthening of regional partnerships. Collaboration between MCOs and health clinics is focused on standardizing processes to access services and implement best practices. Patient, family, and community engagement efforts aim to improve patient experience and address drivers of health equity. Each partner leverages resources and benefits from the collaboration.

Conclusions

Ohio's academically based Regional QI Hub Model offers a promising approach to advancing population health. Policymakers are encouraged to consider integrating academic expertise into state quality strategies.

Bolen S.D., Joseph J.J., Dungan K.M., Beverly E.A., Perzynski A.T., Einstadter D., Fiegl J., Love T.E., Spence D., Jenkins K., Lorenz A., Uddin S.J., Adams K.M., Konstan M.W., Applegate M.S.
2023-12-01 citations by CoLab: 3 Abstract  
We used a collective impact model to form a statewide diabetes quality improvement collaborative to improve diabetes outcomes and advance diabetes health equity. Between 2020 and 2022, in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Medicaid, Medicaid Managed Care Plans, and Ohio’s seven medical schools, we recruited 20 primary care practices across the state. The percentage of patients with hemoglobin A1c greater than 9% improved from 25% to 20% over two years. Applying our model more broadly could accelerate improvement in diabetes outcomes. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print October 12, 2023:e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307410 )
Bolen S.D., Koroukian S., Wright J.T., Persaud H., Einstadter D., Fiegl J., Perzynski A.T., Gunzler D., Sullivan C., Lever J., Konstan M., Crane D., Lorenz A., Menegay M., Spence D., et. al.
Cureus wos Q3
2023-03-14 citations by CoLab: 2
Mormer E., Stevans J.
2019-02-26 citations by CoLab: 8 Abstract  
Purpose This article is intended to serve as a tutorial for speech-language pathology and audiology clinicians and researchers interested in pursuing quality improvement (QI) practice and research. Method Through a number of library database searches, author expertise, and first-hand experiences, we compiled this reference covering the history and landscape of clinical QI practice and QI research. We have included and explained definitions of QI activities and provided an overview of models and methods utilized in the implementation of QI programs. Drawing from scholarly literature on the QI process, we have included tools that should be useful for those clinicians and researchers pursuing QI projects. This article includes some examples of QI projects specific to speech-language pathology and audiology. One highlighted example examined a hospital process of identifying newly admitted patients at risk for communication breakdowns during patient–provider information exchange. Benefits and opportunities associated with QI activities are addressed, as well as barriers and facilitators. Conclusion QI practices and QI research are well within the scope of activities in which speech-language pathologists and audiologists should be engaged. QI is now recognized as a legitimate source of new knowledge and a direct route to improving outcomes and delivery of patient care across clinical settings.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?