volume 18 issue 12 pages 1700251

Comparison of the MHC I Immunopeptidome Repertoire of B-Cell Lymphoblasts Using Two Isolation Methods

Joel Lanoix 1
Chantal Durette 1
Émilie Cossette 1
Simon Comtois-Marotte 1
Marie-Pierre Hardy 1
Caroline Côté 1
Claude Perreault 1, 2, 3
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-04-24
scimago Q2
wos Q1
SJR0.983
CiteScore5.7
Impact factor3.9
ISSN16159853, 16159861
Biochemistry
Molecular Biology
Abstract
Significant technological advances in both affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry have facilitated the identification of peptides associated with the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) molecules, and enabled a greater understanding of the dynamic nature of the immunopeptidome of normal and neoplastic cells. While the isolation of MHC I-associated peptides (MIPs) typically used mild acid elution (MAE) or immunoprecipitation (IP), limited information currently exists regarding their respective analytical merits. Here, a comparison of these approaches for the isolation of two different B-cell lymphoblast cell models is presented, and it is reported on the recovery, reproducibility, scalability, and complementarity of identification from each method. Both approaches yielded reproducible datasets for peptide extracts obtained from 2 to 100 million cells, with 2016 to 5093 MIPs, respectively. The IP typically provides up to 6.4-fold increase in MIPs compared to the MAE. The comprehensiveness of these immunopeptidome analyses is extended using personalized genomic database of B-cell lymphoblasts, and it is discovered that 0.4% of their respective MIP repertoire harbored nonsynonymous single nucleotide variations (also known as minor histocompatibility antigens, MiHAs).
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Frontiers in Immunology
5 publications, 7.81%
Proteomics
4 publications, 6.25%
Journal of Proteome Research
4 publications, 6.25%
Methods in Molecular Biology
4 publications, 6.25%
Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
3 publications, 4.69%
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
2 publications, 3.13%
Seminars in Immunology
2 publications, 3.13%
Mass Spectrometry Reviews
2 publications, 3.13%
Expert Review of Proteomics
2 publications, 3.13%
Infection and Immunity
1 publication, 1.56%
JCI insight
1 publication, 1.56%
Cancers
1 publication, 1.56%
Molecules
1 publication, 1.56%
Vaccines
1 publication, 1.56%
Frontiers in Oncology
1 publication, 1.56%
International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics
1 publication, 1.56%
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
1 publication, 1.56%
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 1.56%
PLoS Computational Biology
1 publication, 1.56%
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
1 publication, 1.56%
Cell Reports
1 publication, 1.56%
Trends in Microbiology
1 publication, 1.56%
Immunology
1 publication, 1.56%
Analytical Chemistry
1 publication, 1.56%
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
1 publication, 1.56%
Cancer Treatment and Research
1 publication, 1.56%
Science Translational Medicine
1 publication, 1.56%
Cancer immunology research
1 publication, 1.56%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
1 publication, 1.56%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Elsevier
13 publications, 20.31%
Springer Nature
10 publications, 15.63%
Wiley
7 publications, 10.94%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
7 publications, 10.94%
Frontiers Media S.A.
6 publications, 9.38%
MDPI
4 publications, 6.25%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
4 publications, 6.25%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
3 publications, 4.69%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 publications, 3.13%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 3.13%
American Society for Microbiology
1 publication, 1.56%
American Society for Clinical Investigation
1 publication, 1.56%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 1.56%
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
1 publication, 1.56%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 1.56%
American Society of Hematology
1 publication, 1.56%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
64
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Lanoix J. et al. Comparison of the MHC I Immunopeptidome Repertoire of B-Cell Lymphoblasts Using Two Isolation Methods // Proteomics. 2018. Vol. 18. No. 12. p. 1700251.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Lanoix J., Durette C., Courcelles M., Cossette É., Comtois-Marotte S., Hardy M., Côté C., Perreault C., Thibault P. Comparison of the MHC I Immunopeptidome Repertoire of B-Cell Lymphoblasts Using Two Isolation Methods // Proteomics. 2018. Vol. 18. No. 12. p. 1700251.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1002/pmic.201700251
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700251
TI - Comparison of the MHC I Immunopeptidome Repertoire of B-Cell Lymphoblasts Using Two Isolation Methods
T2 - Proteomics
AU - Lanoix, Joel
AU - Durette, Chantal
AU - Courcelles, Mathieu
AU - Cossette, Émilie
AU - Comtois-Marotte, Simon
AU - Hardy, Marie-Pierre
AU - Côté, Caroline
AU - Perreault, Claude
AU - Thibault, Pierre
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/04/24
PB - Wiley
SP - 1700251
IS - 12
VL - 18
PMID - 29508533
SN - 1615-9853
SN - 1615-9861
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2018_Lanoix,
author = {Joel Lanoix and Chantal Durette and Mathieu Courcelles and Émilie Cossette and Simon Comtois-Marotte and Marie-Pierre Hardy and Caroline Côté and Claude Perreault and Pierre Thibault},
title = {Comparison of the MHC I Immunopeptidome Repertoire of B-Cell Lymphoblasts Using Two Isolation Methods},
journal = {Proteomics},
year = {2018},
volume = {18},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700251},
number = {12},
pages = {1700251},
doi = {10.1002/pmic.201700251}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Lanoix, Joel, et al. “Comparison of the MHC I Immunopeptidome Repertoire of B-Cell Lymphoblasts Using Two Isolation Methods.” Proteomics, vol. 18, no. 12, Apr. 2018, p. 1700251. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700251.