Open Access
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 15, issue Pt 3, pages 305-312
Test-Retest Reliability of Graph Theory Measures of Structural Brain Connectivity
Emily L. Dennis
1
,
Neda Jahanshad
1
,
Arthur W. Toga
2
,
Katie L. McMahon
3
,
Greig I. de Zubicaray
4
,
Nicholas G. Martin
5
,
Margaret J. Wright
4, 5
,
Paul M. Thompson
1
3
Center for Advanced Imaging, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
|
Publication type: Book Chapter
Publication date: 2012-09-21
Journal:
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
scimago Q2
SJR: 0.606
CiteScore: 2.6
Impact factor: —
ISSN: 03029743, 16113349, 18612075, 18612083
PubMed ID:
23286144
Abstract
The human connectome has recently become a popular research topic in neuroscience, and many new algorithms have been applied to analyze brain networks. In particular, network topology measures from graph theory have been adapted to analyze network efficiency and ‘small-world’ properties. While there has been a surge in the number of papers examining connectivity through graph theory, questions remain about its test-retest reliability (TRT). In particular, the reproducibility of structural connectivity measures has not been assessed. We examined the TRT of global connectivity measures generated from graph theory analyses of 17 young adults who underwent two high-angular resolution diffusion (HARDI) scans approximately 3 months apart. Of the measures assessed, modularity had the highest TRT, and it was stable across a range of sparsities (a thresholding parameter used to define which network edges are retained). These reliability measures underline the need to develop network descriptors that are robust to acquisition parameters.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.