volume 47 issue 3

Utilization of Microbial Biofilms as Monitors of Bioremediation

A. D. Peacock 1
Y.-J. Chang 1
J. D. Istok 2
L Krumholz 3
R Geyer 1, 4
B Kinsall 5
D. Watson 5
K L Sublette 6
D. C. WHITE 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2004-03-04
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.011
CiteScore7.6
Impact factor4.0
ISSN00953628, 1432184X
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Soil Science
Ecology
Abstract
A down-well aquifer microbial sampling system was developed using glass wool or Bio-Sep beads as a solid-phase support matrix. Here we describe the use of these devices to monitor the groundwater microbial community dynamics during field bioremediation experiments at the U.S. Department of Energy Natural and Accelerated Bioremediation Research Program’s Field Research Center at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. During the 6-week deployment, microbial biofilms colonized glass wool and bead internal surfaces. Changes in viable biomass, community composition, metabolic status, and respiratory state were reflected in sampler composition, type of donor, and groundwater pH. Biofilms that formed on Bio-Sep beads had 2–13 times greater viable biomass; however, the bead communities were less metabolically active [higher cyclopropane/monoenoic phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) ratios] and had a lower aerobic respiratory state (lower total respiratory quinone/PLFA ratio and ubiquinone/menaquinone ratio) than the biofilms formed on glass wool. Anaerobic growth in these systems was characterized by plasmalogen phospholipids and was greater in the wells that received electron donor additions. Partial 16S rDNA sequences indicated that Geobacter and nitrate-reducing organisms were induced by the acetate, ethanol, or glucose additions. DNA and lipid biomarkers were extracted and recovered without the complications that commonly plague sediment samples due to the presence of clay or dissolved organic matter. Although microbial community composition in the groundwater or adjacent sediments may differ from those formed on down-well biofilm samplers, the metabolic activity responses of the biofilms to modifications in groundwater geochemistry record the responses of the microbial community to biostimulation while providing integrative sampling and ease of recovery for biomarker analysis.
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Geomicrobiology Journal
9 publications, 10.47%
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
5 publications, 5.81%
Remediation
5 publications, 5.81%
Microbial Ecology
4 publications, 4.65%
Environmental Science & Technology
4 publications, 4.65%
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
3 publications, 3.49%
Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation
3 publications, 3.49%
Water Research
2 publications, 2.33%
Ecological Engineering
2 publications, 2.33%
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
2 publications, 2.33%
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
2 publications, 2.33%
Advances in Microbial Physiology
1 publication, 1.16%
Water Resources Research
1 publication, 1.16%
Journal of Geophysical Research
1 publication, 1.16%
Microorganisms
1 publication, 1.16%
Frontiers in Microbiology
1 publication, 1.16%
Frontiers in Plant Science
1 publication, 1.16%
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
1 publication, 1.16%
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
1 publication, 1.16%
Biogeochemistry
1 publication, 1.16%
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
1 publication, 1.16%
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 1.16%
Advances in Water Resources
1 publication, 1.16%
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
1 publication, 1.16%
Science of the Total Environment
1 publication, 1.16%
Environmental Pollution
1 publication, 1.16%
Fungal Biology Reviews
1 publication, 1.16%
International Journal of Coal Geology
1 publication, 1.16%
Organic Geochemistry
1 publication, 1.16%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Elsevier
25 publications, 29.07%
Springer Nature
16 publications, 18.6%
Wiley
14 publications, 16.28%
Taylor & Francis
11 publications, 12.79%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 publications, 4.65%
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 2.33%
Oxford University Press
2 publications, 2.33%
MDPI
1 publication, 1.16%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 1.16%
American Society for Microbiology
1 publication, 1.16%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 1.16%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 1.16%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
86
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Peacock A. D. et al. Utilization of Microbial Biofilms as Monitors of Bioremediation // Microbial Ecology. 2004. Vol. 47. No. 3.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Peacock A. D., Chang Y., Istok J. D., Krumholz L., Geyer R., Kinsall B., Watson D., Sublette K. L., WHITE D. Utilization of Microbial Biofilms as Monitors of Bioremediation // Microbial Ecology. 2004. Vol. 47. No. 3.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00248-003-1024-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-003-1024-9
TI - Utilization of Microbial Biofilms as Monitors of Bioremediation
T2 - Microbial Ecology
AU - Peacock, A. D.
AU - Chang, Y.-J.
AU - Istok, J. D.
AU - Krumholz, L
AU - Geyer, R
AU - Kinsall, B
AU - Watson, D.
AU - Sublette, K L
AU - WHITE, D. C.
PY - 2004
DA - 2004/03/04
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 3
VL - 47
PMID - 14994174
SN - 0095-3628
SN - 1432-184X
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2004_Peacock,
author = {A. D. Peacock and Y.-J. Chang and J. D. Istok and L Krumholz and R Geyer and B Kinsall and D. Watson and K L Sublette and D. C. WHITE},
title = {Utilization of Microbial Biofilms as Monitors of Bioremediation},
journal = {Microbial Ecology},
year = {2004},
volume = {47},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-003-1024-9},
number = {3},
doi = {10.1007/s00248-003-1024-9}
}