Prospective, Split-Face Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Non-ablative Fractional Laser for Periorbital Photoaging in Different Age Groups

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-03-10
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.945
CiteScore4.0
Impact factor2.8
ISSN0364216X, 14325241
Abstract
The 1550 nm and 1565 nm non-ablative fractional lasers (NAFL) have recently been introduced as treatments for periorbital photoaging. This prospective, randomized split-face trial aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of these NAFL treatments in addressing periorbital photoaging in Asian patients across various age groups. Eighteen patients completed the study, with nine under 45 (Group A) and nine aged 45 or older (Group B). Each received three 1550 nm and 1565 nm non-ablative fractional laser treatments at 6-week intervals on the bilateral periorbital area. Comparative photographs were taken, and wrinkle depression scores and volumes were quantified. Patient satisfaction, adverse reactions, and pain scores were also recorded. Significant improvement in bilateral periorbital photodamage was observed in patients Group B compared to baseline, while no significant improvement was noted in Group A. Throughout the study, Group B showed a trend of better outcomes in periorbital measurements compared to Group A, with a significant difference in treatment improvement between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the two laser treatments. Both laser treatments were well tolerated, with limited and transient complications and no long-term adverse effects. The 1550 nm and 1565 nm NAFL treatments are advanced, effective, and safe methods for improving periorbital photoaging, showing superior and more consistent results in middle-aged and elderly patients. There were no significant differences between the two lasers. Patient age is a crucial factor influencing the effectiveness of these treatments, with middle-aged and elderly patients being the optimal candidates. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .
Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Jia X. et al. Prospective, Split-Face Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Non-ablative Fractional Laser for Periorbital Photoaging in Different Age Groups // Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2025.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Jia X., Zheng H., Huang L., Feng Y. Prospective, Split-Face Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Non-ablative Fractional Laser for Periorbital Photoaging in Different Age Groups // Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2025.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00266-025-04733-y
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-025-04733-y
TI - Prospective, Split-Face Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Non-ablative Fractional Laser for Periorbital Photoaging in Different Age Groups
T2 - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
AU - Jia, Ximeng
AU - Zheng, Heng
AU - Huang, Lvping
AU - Feng, Yongqiang
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/03/10
PB - Springer Nature
SN - 0364-216X
SN - 1432-5241
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Jia,
author = {Ximeng Jia and Heng Zheng and Lvping Huang and Yongqiang Feng},
title = {Prospective, Split-Face Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Non-ablative Fractional Laser for Periorbital Photoaging in Different Age Groups},
journal = {Aesthetic Plastic Surgery},
year = {2025},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {mar},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-025-04733-y},
doi = {10.1007/s00266-025-04733-y}
}