Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided insula resections: is it “Reily” worth it?
J Pepper
1
,
S. Seri
2, 3
,
A.R. Walsh
1
,
S. AGRAWAL
4
,
L Macpherson
5
,
A. Sudarsanam
4
,
W. B. Lo
1
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
|
2
Department of Neurophysiology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
|
4
Department of Neurology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
|
5
Department of Radiology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2024-12-09
scimago Q2
wos Q3
SJR: 0.478
CiteScore: 2.5
Impact factor: 1.2
ISSN: 02567040, 14330350
PubMed ID:
39652128
Abstract
Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is widely used to characterise epileptic networks and guide resection in paediatric epilepsy surgery programmes. The insula, with its extensive connectivity with temporal and extratemporal structures, has increasingly been seen as a possible surgical target. We report our seizure outcomes after SEEG-guided resection of the insula in a paediatric cohort. From our paediatric epilepsy surgery database of patients aged 0–19 years, we analysed demographic and clinical data of those who underwent SEEG-guided insula cortex resection. In total, 11 children (7 females, 4 males) who underwent SEEG-guided resection were identified. The mean age at first SEEG was 13 years old. Mean age at seizure onset was 4.3 years; seizure frequency ranged from 50/day to 2/week. Four children required 1 SEEG study, 6 children 2 SEEG, and 1 child underwent 3 SEEG recordings. The mean follow-up duration was 2.1 years; at the latest follow-up, three children had Engel I, 2 children Engel III, and 6 children Engel IV. One child classified as an Engel IV outcome for insular surgery had Engel class I after 2 failed insula surgeries, after an occult frontal focal cortical dysplasia was later identified and resected. No major complications were noted. In our paediatric series, one third of the patients undergoing insula cortex surgery after SEEG became seizure free but this may require repeat SEEG implantation, repeat resective surgery and the possibility of changing hypothesis from the insula cortex to nearby foci.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Total citations:
0
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Pepper J. et al. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided insula resections: is it “Reily” worth it? // Child's Nervous System. 2024. Vol. 41. No. 1. 41
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Pepper J., Seri S., Walsh A., AGRAWAL S., Macpherson L., Sudarsanam A., Lo W. B. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided insula resections: is it “Reily” worth it? // Child's Nervous System. 2024. Vol. 41. No. 1. 41
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00381-024-06661-9
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00381-024-06661-9
TI - Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided insula resections: is it “Reily” worth it?
T2 - Child's Nervous System
AU - Pepper, J
AU - Seri, S.
AU - Walsh, A.R.
AU - AGRAWAL, S.
AU - Macpherson, L
AU - Sudarsanam, A.
AU - Lo, W. B.
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/12/09
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 41
PMID - 39652128
SN - 0256-7040
SN - 1433-0350
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2024_Pepper,
author = {J Pepper and S. Seri and A.R. Walsh and S. AGRAWAL and L Macpherson and A. Sudarsanam and W. B. Lo},
title = {Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided insula resections: is it “Reily” worth it?},
journal = {Child's Nervous System},
year = {2024},
volume = {41},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {dec},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00381-024-06661-9},
number = {1},
pages = {41},
doi = {10.1007/s00381-024-06661-9}
}