Assessment of tissue-air ratios in epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms for radiation dosimetry: findings from experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations

Hamza Sekkat 1
KHALLOUQI ABDELLAH 1, 2, 3
Omar El Rhazouani 1
Abdellah Halimi 1
1
 
Laboratory of Health Sciences and Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan First University, Settat, Morocco
2
 
Department of Radiology, Public Hospital of Mediouna, Mediouna, Morocco
3
 
Department of Radiology, Private Hospital of Hay Mouhamadi, Casablanca, Morocco
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-01-15
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.472
CiteScore3.7
Impact factor2.3
ISSN0301634X, 14322099
Abstract
This study assesses radiation doses in multi-slice computed tomography (CT) using epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms, focusing on the relationship between TAR (tissue air ratio) and kilovoltage peak (kVp). The research was conducted using a Hitachi Supria 16-slice CT scanner. An epoxy resin phantom was fabricated from commercially available materials, to simulate human tissue. The phantom contained four peripheral inserts and one central insert for dose measurement, with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters positioned at various depths (2 to 10 cm). Monte Carlo simulations were executed using the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission toolkit (GATE) to model photon transport, with the x-ray spectrum generated using SpekPy software. A non-linear fitting model was developed to describe the TAR-kVp relationship across different depths for epoxy resin and PMMA. Results indicated that TAR values were higher at low depths (2 cm) and decreased with increasing depth, reflecting the x-ray beam’s attenuation. For instance, at 80 kVp and 2 cm depth, the experimental TAR for PMMA was 1.102 ± 0.011, closely matching the MC simulation value of 1.110 ± 0.036, resulting in a small difference of 0.7%. At a depth of 10 cm, the experimental TAR for PMMA decreased to 0.245 ± 0.006, while the MC TAR was 0.248 ± 0.016, with a relative difference of 1.2%. Similar trends were observed for epoxy resin, where the experimental TAR ranged from 1.070 ± 0.014 at 2 cm to 0.235 ± 0.009 at 10 cm, while MC simulation values ranged from 1.080 ± 0.038 to 0.238 ± 0.017. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed these results, with mean differences of 0.008 for PMMA and 0.006 for epoxy resin, indicating high agreement between the experimental and simulated TAR values. This study highlights the importance of phantom material selection in dose assessment and the implications of TAR in dose correction within the context of diagnostic radiology.
Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Sekkat H. et al. Assessment of tissue-air ratios in epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms for radiation dosimetry: findings from experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations // Radiation and Environmental Biophysics. 2025.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Sekkat H., ABDELLAH K., Rhazouani O. E., Halimi A. Assessment of tissue-air ratios in epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms for radiation dosimetry: findings from experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations // Radiation and Environmental Biophysics. 2025.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00411-024-01105-z
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00411-024-01105-z
TI - Assessment of tissue-air ratios in epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms for radiation dosimetry: findings from experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations
T2 - Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
AU - Sekkat, Hamza
AU - ABDELLAH, KHALLOUQI
AU - Rhazouani, Omar El
AU - Halimi, Abdellah
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/01/15
PB - Springer Nature
SN - 0301-634X
SN - 1432-2099
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Sekkat,
author = {Hamza Sekkat and KHALLOUQI ABDELLAH and Omar El Rhazouani and Abdellah Halimi},
title = {Assessment of tissue-air ratios in epoxy resin and PMMA phantoms for radiation dosimetry: findings from experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations},
journal = {Radiation and Environmental Biophysics},
year = {2025},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00411-024-01105-z},
doi = {10.1007/s00411-024-01105-z}
}