volume 124 issue 4 publication number 40

Implementation of real-time PCR assays for diagnosing intestinal protozoa infections

Christian N. Lotz 1, 2
Pierre H. H. Schneeberger 1, 2
Maura Concu 1, 2
Said M. Ali 3
Emmanuel C Mrimi 1, 2, 4
J Keiser 1, 2
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-04-08
scimago Q1
wos Q3
SJR0.565
CiteScore3.8
Impact factor2.0
ISSN09320113, 14321955
Abstract

Intestinal protozoa infections present a major public health challenge, particularly in areas with poor sanitation and limited access to clean water. Effective diagnostic methods are critical, yet traditional microscopy, though widely used for its simplicity, lacks the sensitivity and specificity of modern techniques like real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), making the latter a more effective tool for monitoring and assessing the burden of intestinal protozoa diseases. In this study, we implemented two duplex qPCR assays to detect Entamoeba dispar + Entamoeba histolytica and Cryptosporidium spp. + Chilomastix mesnili, along with singleplex assays for Giardia duodenalis and Blastocystis spp., using a 10 µL reaction volume. This marks the first molecular detection of Chilomastix mesnili by qPCR, enhancing diagnostic precision. Using these, we analyzed stool samples from 70 patients on Pemba Island, Tanzania, before and 54 samples after treatment with 20, 25, or 30 mg of emodepside or placebo, aiming to assess protozoa prevalence for this region and emodepside’s potential antiprotozoal effects. Our qPCR reliably detected protozoa in 74.4% of samples, with Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in 31.4% of cases. Notably, one-third of these infections were caused by Entamoeba histolytica. No significant reduction in protozoa was observed after emodepside treatment compared to placebo. The study highlights the utility of qPCR in providing species-level differentiation and improving the speed and cost-effectiveness of testing. The high prevalence of protozoa in this region underscores the need for continued monitoring and control efforts, though emodepside was not effective against protozoa infections.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Lotz C. N. et al. Implementation of real-time PCR assays for diagnosing intestinal protozoa infections // Parasitology Research. 2025. Vol. 124. No. 4. 40
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Lotz C. N., Schneeberger P. H. H., Concu M., Ali S. M., Mrimi E. C., Keiser J. Implementation of real-time PCR assays for diagnosing intestinal protozoa infections // Parasitology Research. 2025. Vol. 124. No. 4. 40
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00436-025-08483-3
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00436-025-08483-3
TI - Implementation of real-time PCR assays for diagnosing intestinal protozoa infections
T2 - Parasitology Research
AU - Lotz, Christian N.
AU - Schneeberger, Pierre H. H.
AU - Concu, Maura
AU - Ali, Said M.
AU - Mrimi, Emmanuel C
AU - Keiser, J
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/04/08
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 4
VL - 124
SN - 0932-0113
SN - 1432-1955
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Lotz,
author = {Christian N. Lotz and Pierre H. H. Schneeberger and Maura Concu and Said M. Ali and Emmanuel C Mrimi and J Keiser},
title = {Implementation of real-time PCR assays for diagnosing intestinal protozoa infections},
journal = {Parasitology Research},
year = {2025},
volume = {124},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {apr},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00436-025-08483-3},
number = {4},
pages = {40},
doi = {10.1007/s00436-025-08483-3}
}