SOAR versus SQ3R: a test of two study systems
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2013-10-29
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.022
CiteScore: 5.1
Impact factor: 2.1
ISSN: 00204277, 15731952
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Education
Abstract
Although researchers have long investigated ways to improve study habits and raise achievement, few studies compare study strategy systems with one another. No study to date has compared the long popular SQ3R (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review) system with the more modern SOAR (Select, Organize, Associate, Regulate) system. This study directly compared SQ3R and SOAR to determine which is most effective. College students trained in the SQ3R or SOAR system and given corresponding study materials used their respective method to study a text in preparation for a test assessing fact, relationship, and concept learning. Results confirmed that students who used the SOAR system outperformed those who used the SQ3R system and learned 20 % more relationships, 14 % more facts, and 13 % more concepts. Results were attributed to SOAR’s cognitive processing advantages over SQ3R.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
|
|
|
Educational Psychology Review
2 publications, 16.67%
|
|
|
Reading and Writing
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Contemporary Educational Psychology
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Thinking Skills and Creativity
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Innovative Digital Practices and Globalization in Higher Education
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
College Teaching
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Cogent Education
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Robots in Academic Libraries
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Education
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
1
2
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Springer Nature
3 publications, 25%
|
|
|
Elsevier
2 publications, 16.67%
|
|
|
IGI Global
2 publications, 16.67%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 16.67%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 8.33%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
12
Total citations:
12
Citations from 2025:
0
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Jairam D. et al. SOAR versus SQ3R: a test of two study systems // Instructional Science. 2013. Vol. 42. No. 3. pp. 409-420.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Jairam D., Kiewra K. A., Rogers Kasson S., Patterson Hazley M., Marxhausen K. SOAR versus SQ3R: a test of two study systems // Instructional Science. 2013. Vol. 42. No. 3. pp. 409-420.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s11251-013-9295-0
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9295-0
TI - SOAR versus SQ3R: a test of two study systems
T2 - Instructional Science
AU - Jairam, Dharma
AU - Kiewra, Kenneth A.
AU - Rogers Kasson, Sarah
AU - Patterson Hazley, Melissa
AU - Marxhausen, Kim
PY - 2013
DA - 2013/10/29
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 409-420
IS - 3
VL - 42
SN - 0020-4277
SN - 1573-1952
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2013_Jairam,
author = {Dharma Jairam and Kenneth A. Kiewra and Sarah Rogers Kasson and Melissa Patterson Hazley and Kim Marxhausen},
title = {SOAR versus SQ3R: a test of two study systems},
journal = {Instructional Science},
year = {2013},
volume = {42},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {oct},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9295-0},
number = {3},
pages = {409--420},
doi = {10.1007/s11251-013-9295-0}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Jairam, Dharma, et al. “SOAR versus SQ3R: a test of two study systems.” Instructional Science, vol. 42, no. 3, Oct. 2013, pp. 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9295-0.