A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2019-05-30
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.992
CiteScore: 7.3
Impact factor: 4.2
ISSN: 08848734, 15251497
PubMed ID:
31147980
Internal Medicine
Abstract
Approximately 25 million people in the USA are limited English proficient (LEP). When LEP patients receive care from physicians who are truly language concordant, some evidence show that language disparities are reduced, but others demonstrate worse outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to compare the impact of language-concordant care for LEP patients with that of other interventions, including professional and ad hoc interpreters. Data was collected through a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE in October 2017. The literature search strategy had three main components, which were immigrant/minority status, language barrier/proficiency, and healthcare provider/patient relationship. The quality of the articles was appraised using the Downs and Black checklist. The 33 studies were grouped by the outcome measure studied, including quality of care (subdivided into primary care, diabetes, pain management, cancer, and inpatient), satisfaction with care/communication, medical understanding, and mental health. Of the 33, 4 (6.9%) were randomized controlled trials and the remaining 29 (87.9%) were cross-sectional studies. Seventy-six percent (25/33) of the studies demonstrated that at least one of the outcomes assessed was better for patients receiving language-concordant care, while 15% (5/33) of studies demonstrated no difference in outcomes, and 9% (3/33) studies demonstrated worse outcomes in patients receiving language-concordant care. The findings of this review indicate that, in the majority of situations, language-concordant care improves outcomes. Although most studies included were of good quality, none provided a standardized assessment of provider language skills. To systematically evaluate the impact of truly language-concordant care on outcomes and draw meaningful conclusions, future studies must include an assessment of clinician language proficiency. Language-concordant care offers an important way for physicians to meet the unique needs of their LEP patients.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
|
Journal of General Internal Medicine
17 publications, 4.39%
|
|
|
Patient Education and Counseling
14 publications, 3.62%
|
|
|
Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities
10 publications, 2.58%
|
|
|
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
9 publications, 2.33%
|
|
|
Health Equity
6 publications, 1.55%
|
|
|
JAMA network open
6 publications, 1.55%
|
|
|
International Journal for Equity in Health
5 publications, 1.29%
|
|
|
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
5 publications, 1.29%
|
|
|
Hospital pediatrics
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
BMC Medical Education
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
Cureus
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
Obstetrics and Gynecology
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
Pediatrics
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Academic Medicine
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Journal of Surgical Research
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Laryngoscope
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Health Expectations
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Health Communication
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
BMJ Quality and Safety
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
BMJ Open
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
JCO Oncology Practice
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Epilepsy Currents
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Ear and Hearing
2 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Critical Care Explorations
2 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
|
Springer Nature
87 publications, 22.48%
|
|
|
Elsevier
75 publications, 19.38%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
35 publications, 9.04%
|
|
|
Wiley
32 publications, 8.27%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
21 publications, 5.43%
|
|
|
SAGE
19 publications, 4.91%
|
|
|
MDPI
13 publications, 3.36%
|
|
|
BMJ
10 publications, 2.58%
|
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
10 publications, 2.58%
|
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
9 publications, 2.33%
|
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
7 publications, 1.81%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
5 publications, 1.29%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
5 publications, 1.29%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 publications, 1.29%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
SLACK
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
4 publications, 1.03%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
3 publications, 0.78%
|
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
2 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
University of Chicago Press
2 publications, 0.52%
|
|
|
American Public Health Association
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
|
Joint Commission Resources Inc.
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
|
American Dental Education Association
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
|
Society of Hospital Medicine
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.26%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
387
Total citations:
387
Citations from 2024:
195
(50.39%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Diamond L. et al. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes // Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2019. Vol. 34. No. 8. pp. 1591-1606.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Diamond L., Izquierdo K., Canfield D., Matsoukas K., Gany F. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes // Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2019. Vol. 34. No. 8. pp. 1591-1606.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5
TI - A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes
T2 - Journal of General Internal Medicine
AU - Diamond, Lisa
AU - Izquierdo, Karen
AU - Canfield, Dana
AU - Matsoukas, Konstantina
AU - Gany, Francesca
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/05/30
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 1591-1606
IS - 8
VL - 34
PMID - 31147980
SN - 0884-8734
SN - 1525-1497
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2019_Diamond,
author = {Lisa Diamond and Karen Izquierdo and Dana Canfield and Konstantina Matsoukas and Francesca Gany},
title = {A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes},
journal = {Journal of General Internal Medicine},
year = {2019},
volume = {34},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5},
number = {8},
pages = {1591--1606},
doi = {10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Diamond, Lisa, et al. “A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes.” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 34, no. 8, May. 2019, pp. 1591-1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5.