Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?
1
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2017-09-19
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR: 0.517
CiteScore: 2.1
Impact factor: 2.7
ISSN: 18693474, 18693482
PubMed ID:
29391907
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Abstract
Numerous methods to segment tumors using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) have been introduced. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) refers to the metabolically active volume of the tumor segmented using FDG PET, and has been shown to be useful in predicting patient outcome and in assessing treatment response. Also, tumor segmentation using FDG PET has useful applications in radiotherapy treatment planning. Despite extensive research on MTV showing promising results, MTV is not used in standard clinical practice yet, mainly because there is no consensus on the optimal method to segment tumors in FDG PET images. In this review, we discuss currently available methods to measure MTV using FDG PET, and assess the advantages and disadvantages of the methods.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
|
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
11 publications, 5.37%
|
|
|
Cancers
10 publications, 4.88%
|
|
|
Nuclear Medicine Communications
7 publications, 3.41%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
7 publications, 3.41%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
7 publications, 3.41%
|
|
|
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
6 publications, 2.93%
|
|
|
Diagnostics
6 publications, 2.93%
|
|
|
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
5 publications, 2.44%
|
|
|
EJNMMI Research
5 publications, 2.44%
|
|
|
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
4 publications, 1.95%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
4 publications, 1.95%
|
|
|
Clinical and Translational Imaging
4 publications, 1.95%
|
|
|
Cancer Imaging
4 publications, 1.95%
|
|
|
PET Clinics
4 publications, 1.95%
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
4 publications, 1.95%
|
|
|
Metabolites
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Biomedicines
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
BMC Cancer
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
British Journal of Radiology
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
Radiology
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
Medicine (United States)
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
Tomography
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
British Journal of Haematology
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Neurology
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
EJNMMI Physics
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
European Radiology
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
|
Springer Nature
65 publications, 31.71%
|
|
|
MDPI
29 publications, 14.15%
|
|
|
Elsevier
25 publications, 12.2%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
17 publications, 8.29%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
14 publications, 6.83%
|
|
|
Wiley
13 publications, 6.34%
|
|
|
Society of Nuclear Medicine
10 publications, 4.88%
|
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
3 publications, 1.46%
|
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
Spandidos Publications
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
SAGE
2 publications, 0.98%
|
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
The Korean Society of Radiology
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
Non-profit partnership Society of Interventional Oncoradiologists
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
Vidar, Ltd
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
Society for Translational Oncology
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
XMLink
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
AME Publishing Company
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
Apex Publishing
1 publication, 0.49%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
205
Total citations:
205
Citations from 2024:
60
(29.27%)
The most citing journal
Citations in journal:
11
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Im H. et al. Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better? // Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2017. Vol. 52. No. 1. pp. 5-15.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Im H., Bradshaw T., Solaiyappan M., Cho S. Y. Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better? // Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2017. Vol. 52. No. 1. pp. 5-15.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s13139-017-0493-6
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-017-0493-6
TI - Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?
T2 - Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
AU - Im, Hyung-Jun
AU - Bradshaw, Tyler
AU - Solaiyappan, Meiyappan
AU - Cho, Steve Y.
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/09/19
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 5-15
IS - 1
VL - 52
PMID - 29391907
SN - 1869-3474
SN - 1869-3482
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2017_Im,
author = {Hyung-Jun Im and Tyler Bradshaw and Meiyappan Solaiyappan and Steve Y. Cho},
title = {Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?},
journal = {Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
year = {2017},
volume = {52},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-017-0493-6},
number = {1},
pages = {5--15},
doi = {10.1007/s13139-017-0493-6}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Im, Hyung-Jun, et al. “Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?.” Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 52, no. 1, Sep. 2017, pp. 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-017-0493-6.