volume 126 issue 1 pages 1-125

A re-evaluation of Diaporthe: refining the boundaries of species and species complexes

ASHA J. DISSANAYAKE 1
Jin-Tao Zhu 1
Ya-Ya Chen 2
SAJEEWA S.N. MAHARACHCHIKUMBURA 1
Kevin D. Hyde 3, 4, 5, 6
JIAN-KUI (JACK) LIU 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-07-09
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR6.546
CiteScore46.0
Impact factor24.8
ISSN15602745, 18789129
Abstract

Diaporthe is an important plant pathogenic genus, which also occurs as endophytes and saprobes. Many Diaporthe species that are morphologically similar proved to be genetically distinct. The current understanding of Diaporthe taxonomy by applying morphological characters, host associations and multi-gene phylogeny are problematic leading to overestimation/underestimation of species numbers of this significant fungal pathogenic genus. Currently, there are no definite boundaries for the accepted species. Hence, the present study aims to re-structure the genus Diaporthe, based on single gene phylogenies (ITS, tef, tub, cal and his), multi-gene phylogeny justified by applying GCPSR (Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition) methodology as well as the coalescence-based models (PTP—Poisson Tree Processes and mPTP—multi-rate Poisson Tree Processes). Considering all available type isolates of Diaporthe, the genus is divided into seven sections while boundaries for 13 species and 15 species-complexes are proposed. To support this re-assessment of the genus, 82 Diaporthe isolates obtained from woody hosts in Guizhou Province in China were investigated and revealed the presence of two novel species and 17 previously known species. Synonymies are specified for 31 species based on molecular data and morphological studies. Dividing Diaporthe into several specific sections based on phylogenetic analyses can avoid the construction of lengthy phylogenetic trees of the entire genus in future taxonomic studies. In other words, when one conducts research related to the genus, only species from the appropriate section need to be selected for phylogenetic analysis.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
Fungal Diversity
6 publications, 13.95%
MycoKeys
6 publications, 13.95%
IMA Fungus
4 publications, 9.3%
Journal of Fungi
3 publications, 6.98%
Plants
2 publications, 4.65%
Plant Disease
2 publications, 4.65%
Crop Protection
2 publications, 4.65%
BMC Microbiology
1 publication, 2.33%
Phytotaxa
1 publication, 2.33%
Biology
1 publication, 2.33%
Mycobiology
1 publication, 2.33%
Fungal Biology
1 publication, 2.33%
Pathogens
1 publication, 2.33%
Ukrainian Botanical Journal
1 publication, 2.33%
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
1 publication, 2.33%
International Journal of Vegetable Science
1 publication, 2.33%
Frontiers in Microbiology
1 publication, 2.33%
Mycological Progress
1 publication, 2.33%
Physiologia Plantarum
1 publication, 2.33%
Microbiology Research
1 publication, 2.33%
CABI Agriculture and Bioscience
1 publication, 2.33%
Studies in Fungi
1 publication, 2.33%
Mycologia
1 publication, 2.33%
Frontiers in Plant Science
1 publication, 2.33%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
Pensoft Publishers
10 publications, 23.26%
Springer Nature
8 publications, 18.6%
MDPI
8 publications, 18.6%
Taylor & Francis
3 publications, 6.98%
Elsevier
3 publications, 6.98%
Scientific Societies
2 publications, 4.65%
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 4.65%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 2.33%
Magnolia Press
1 publication, 2.33%
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
1 publication, 2.33%
Microbiology Society
1 publication, 2.33%
Wiley
1 publication, 2.33%
CABI Publishing
1 publication, 2.33%
Maximum Academic Press
1 publication, 2.33%
2
4
6
8
10
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
43
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
DISSANAYAKE A. J. et al. A re-evaluation of Diaporthe: refining the boundaries of species and species complexes // Fungal Diversity. 2024. Vol. 126. No. 1. pp. 1-125.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
DISSANAYAKE A. J., Zhu J., Chen Y., MAHARACHCHIKUMBURA S. S., Hyde K. D., LIU J. (. A re-evaluation of Diaporthe: refining the boundaries of species and species complexes // Fungal Diversity. 2024. Vol. 126. No. 1. pp. 1-125.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s13225-024-00538-7
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13225-024-00538-7
TI - A re-evaluation of Diaporthe: refining the boundaries of species and species complexes
T2 - Fungal Diversity
AU - DISSANAYAKE, ASHA J.
AU - Zhu, Jin-Tao
AU - Chen, Ya-Ya
AU - MAHARACHCHIKUMBURA, SAJEEWA S.N.
AU - Hyde, Kevin D.
AU - LIU, JIAN-KUI (JACK)
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/07/09
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 1-125
IS - 1
VL - 126
SN - 1560-2745
SN - 1878-9129
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_DISSANAYAKE,
author = {ASHA J. DISSANAYAKE and Jin-Tao Zhu and Ya-Ya Chen and SAJEEWA S.N. MAHARACHCHIKUMBURA and Kevin D. Hyde and JIAN-KUI (JACK) LIU},
title = {A re-evaluation of Diaporthe: refining the boundaries of species and species complexes},
journal = {Fungal Diversity},
year = {2024},
volume = {126},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jul},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13225-024-00538-7},
number = {1},
pages = {1--125},
doi = {10.1007/s13225-024-00538-7}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
DISSANAYAKE, ASHA J., et al. “A re-evaluation of Diaporthe: refining the boundaries of species and species complexes.” Fungal Diversity, vol. 126, no. 1, Jul. 2024, pp. 1-125. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13225-024-00538-7.