volume 34 issue 2 pages 265-288

Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-12-20
scimago Q1
SJR1.862
CiteScore11.4
Impact factor
ISSN22105433, 22105441
History and Philosophy of Science
Philosophy
Abstract
Many of the computing systems programmed using Machine Learning are opaque: it is difficult to know why they do what they do or how they work. Explainable Artificial Intelligence aims to develop analytic techniques that render opaque computing systems transparent, but lacks a normative framework with which to evaluate these techniques’ explanatory successes. The aim of the present discussion is to develop such a framework, paying particular attention to different stakeholders’ distinct explanatory requirements. Building on an analysis of “opacity” from philosophy of science, this framework is modeled after accounts of explanation in cognitive science. The framework distinguishes between the explanation-seeking questions that are likely to be asked by different stakeholders, and specifies the general ways in which these questions should be answered so as to allow these stakeholders to perform their roles in the Machine Learning ecosystem. By applying the normative framework to recently developed techniques such as input heatmapping, feature-detector visualization, and diagnostic classification, it is possible to determine whether and to what extent techniques from Explainable Artificial Intelligence can be used to render opaque computing systems transparent and, thus, whether they can be used to solve the Black Box Problem.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
AI and Society
10 publications, 4.17%
Minds and Machines
10 publications, 4.17%
Philosophy and Technology
9 publications, 3.75%
Around the Tree
9 publications, 3.75%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
7 publications, 2.92%
Synthese
6 publications, 2.5%
AI and Ethics
6 publications, 2.5%
Ethics and Information Technology
4 publications, 1.67%
Communications in Computer and Information Science
4 publications, 1.67%
Algorithms
2 publications, 0.83%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
2 publications, 0.83%
Frontiers in Digital Health
2 publications, 0.83%
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
2 publications, 0.83%
Erkenntnis
2 publications, 0.83%
Information Fusion
2 publications, 0.83%
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
2 publications, 0.83%
Journal of Medical Ethics
2 publications, 0.83%
Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
2 publications, 0.83%
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
2 publications, 0.83%
Cureus
2 publications, 0.83%
American Journal of Bioethics
2 publications, 0.83%
Health Informatics Journal
2 publications, 0.83%
IEEE Access
2 publications, 0.83%
International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics
1 publication, 0.42%
Journal of Organizational and End User Computing
1 publication, 0.42%
JMIR Cancer
1 publication, 0.42%
Coatings
1 publication, 0.42%
Sensors
1 publication, 0.42%
Philosophies
1 publication, 0.42%
2
4
6
8
10

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
Springer Nature
108 publications, 45%
Elsevier
28 publications, 11.67%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
17 publications, 7.08%
MDPI
15 publications, 6.25%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
7 publications, 2.92%
Taylor & Francis
7 publications, 2.92%
IGI Global
6 publications, 2.5%
Frontiers Media S.A.
6 publications, 2.5%
Wiley
6 publications, 2.5%
JMIR Publications
5 publications, 2.08%
SAGE
5 publications, 2.08%
Emerald
4 publications, 1.67%
Cambridge University Press
4 publications, 1.67%
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 1.25%
BMJ
2 publications, 0.83%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 0.83%
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1 publication, 0.42%
University of Montreal
1 publication, 0.42%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.42%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.42%
Eco-Vector LLC
1 publication, 0.42%
Kemerovo State University
1 publication, 0.42%
OpenEdition
1 publication, 0.42%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 0.42%
XMLink
1 publication, 0.42%
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
1 publication, 0.42%
The Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
1 publication, 0.42%
University of Bialystok
1 publication, 0.42%
F1000 Research
1 publication, 0.42%
20
40
60
80
100
120
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
241
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Zednik C. Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence // Philosophy and Technology. 2019. Vol. 34. No. 2. pp. 265-288.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Zednik C. Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence // Philosophy and Technology. 2019. Vol. 34. No. 2. pp. 265-288.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7
TI - Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence
T2 - Philosophy and Technology
AU - Zednik, Carlos
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/12/20
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 265-288
IS - 2
VL - 34
SN - 2210-5433
SN - 2210-5441
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2019_Zednik,
author = {Carlos Zednik},
title = {Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence},
journal = {Philosophy and Technology},
year = {2019},
volume = {34},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7},
number = {2},
pages = {265--288},
doi = {10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Zednik, Carlos. “Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence.” Philosophy and Technology, vol. 34, no. 2, Dec. 2019, pp. 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7.