,
pages 66-68
Evaluation of the Model
2
Mosby Consumer Health, Salt Lake City, USA
|
Publication type: Book Chapter
Publication date: 1997-01-01
Abstract
In the evaluation phase, the expert system is tested by comparing the differential diagnosis at each stage of the patient workup with the expert’s opinion and determining where the knowledge base might be revised to improve performance. This process is carried out first. If the system appears to be overconfident about a particular diagnosis (i.e., assigns a higher probability to that diagnosis than the expert thinks appropriate), suspicion is raised that the false positive rate assigned to some data item already entered for the patient being diagnosed is too low. Another explanation might be that highly associated findings are being treated as independent; i.e., they need to be represented as an “or” group or built into a cluster.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Total citations:
0
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - GENERIC
DO - 10.1007/978-1-4612-1822-7_6
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1822-7_6
TI - Evaluation of the Model
T2 - Nursing and Computers
AU - WARNER, HOMER R.
AU - Sorenson, Dean K
AU - Bouhaddou, Omar
PY - 1997
DA - 1997/01/01
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 66-68
SN - 1431-1909
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@incollection{1997_WARNER,
author = {HOMER R. WARNER and Dean K Sorenson and Omar Bouhaddou},
title = {Evaluation of the Model},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
year = {1997},
pages = {66--68},
month = {jan}
}