Academic Citizenship, Identity, Knowledge, and Vulnerability, pages 17-23

Our Order of Knowledge: Disciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and Beyond

Paul I Kadetz 1, 2
2
 
Integrated Engineering, Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, University of San Diego, San Diego, USA
Publication typeBook Chapter
Publication date2024-10-21
SJR
CiteScore
Impact factor
ISSN23662573, 23662581
Abstract
This chapter examines the development of disciplinarity as an outcome of Western order and binary logic and how this has resulted in reductive thinking and disciplinary specialization. Such specialization can thwart the ability of engineers and other practitioners to redress complex challenges that require an understanding beyond reductive simple systems thinking. Transdisciplinarity offers an approach to work beyond siloed knowledge to comprehend and intervene with complex challenges from across a full spectrum of ways of understanding. Learning to listen and work with local knowledge through assets-based approaches, such as Positive Deviance, further supports transdisciplinarity and can foster the most appropriate engineering interventions for any given context.
Neumann R.
2009-06-03 citations by CoLab: 7
Marsh D.R., Schroeder D.G., Dearden K.A., Sternin J., Sternin M.
BMJ scimago Q1 wos Q1
2004-11-11 citations by CoLab: 439 Abstract  
Identifying individuals with better outcome than their peers (positive deviance) and enabling communities to adopt the behaviours that explain the improved outcome are powerful methods of producing change
Clark B.R.
1983-12-31 citations by CoLab: 1428

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?