International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, volume 73, issue 1-4, pages 509-519

Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE)

Farzad Rayegani 1
Godfrey C. Onwubolu 1
1
 
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Applied Science and Technology, Sheridan Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Brampton, Canada
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2014-04-25
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q2
Impact factor3.4
ISSN02683768, 14333015
Computer Science Applications
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Software
Control and Systems Engineering
Abstract
This paper presents the research done to determine the functional relationship between process parameters and tensile strength for the fused deposition modelling (FDM) process using the group method for data modelling for prediction purposes. An initial test was carried out to determine whether part orientation and raster angle variations affect the tensile strength. It was found that both process parameters affect tensile strength response. Further experimentations were carried out in which the process parameters considered were part orientation, raster angle, raster width and air gap. The process parameters and the experimental results were submitted to the group method of data handling (GMDH), resulting in predicted output, in which the predicted output values were found to correlate very closely with the measured values. Using differential evolution (DE), optimal process parameters have been found to achieve good strength simultaneously for the response. The mathematical model of the response of the tensile strength with respect to the process parameters comprising part orientation, raster angle, raster width and air gap has been developed based on GMDH, and it has been found that the functionality of the additive manufacturing part produced is improved by optimizing the process parameters. The results obtained are very promising, and hence, the approach presented in this paper has practical application for the design and manufacture of parts using additive manufacturing technologies.

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
17 publications, 7.02%
Materials Today: Proceedings
14 publications, 5.79%
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
12 publications, 4.96%
Additive Manufacturing
9 publications, 3.72%
Polymers
6 publications, 2.48%
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing
6 publications, 2.48%
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
6 publications, 2.48%
Materials
5 publications, 2.07%
Procedia Manufacturing
5 publications, 2.07%
Rapid Prototyping Journal
4 publications, 1.65%
Composites Part B: Engineering
4 publications, 1.65%
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
4 publications, 1.65%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
3 publications, 1.24%
Advances in Manufacturing
3 publications, 1.24%
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
3 publications, 1.24%
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
3 publications, 1.24%
AIP Conference Proceedings
3 publications, 1.24%
MATEC Web of Conferences
2 publications, 0.83%
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
2 publications, 0.83%
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
2 publications, 0.83%
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
2 publications, 0.83%
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
2 publications, 0.83%
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
2 publications, 0.83%
Machines
2 publications, 0.83%
Crystals
2 publications, 0.83%
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
2 publications, 0.83%
Heliyon
2 publications, 0.83%
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
2 publications, 0.83%
CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.83%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Springer Nature
66 publications, 27.27%
Elsevier
64 publications, 26.45%
MDPI
23 publications, 9.5%
SAGE
12 publications, 4.96%
Wiley
12 publications, 4.96%
IOP Publishing
10 publications, 4.13%
Taylor & Francis
7 publications, 2.89%
Emerald
5 publications, 2.07%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
5 publications, 2.07%
ASME International
3 publications, 1.24%
EDP Sciences
3 publications, 1.24%
World Scientific
3 publications, 1.24%
AIP Publishing
3 publications, 1.24%
Scientific Research Publishing
2 publications, 0.83%
Walter de Gruyter
2 publications, 0.83%
Research Square Platform LLC
2 publications, 0.83%
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 publication, 0.41%
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
1 publication, 0.41%
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.41%
American Society for Testing and Materials
1 publication, 0.41%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.41%
Institute of Technology and Production Management University of J.E. Purkyne
1 publication, 0.41%
OAE Publishing Inc.
1 publication, 0.41%
IWA Publishing
1 publication, 0.41%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.41%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Rayegani F., Onwubolu G. C. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE) // International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2014. Vol. 73. No. 1-4. pp. 509-519.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Rayegani F., Onwubolu G. C. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE) // International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2014. Vol. 73. No. 1-4. pp. 509-519.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2
TI - Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE)
T2 - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
AU - Rayegani, Farzad
AU - Onwubolu, Godfrey C.
PY - 2014
DA - 2014/04/25
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 509-519
IS - 1-4
VL - 73
SN - 0268-3768
SN - 1433-3015
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2014_Rayegani,
author = {Farzad Rayegani and Godfrey C. Onwubolu},
title = {Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE)},
journal = {International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology},
year = {2014},
volume = {73},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2},
number = {1-4},
pages = {509--519},
doi = {10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Rayegani, Farzad, and Godfrey C. Onwubolu. “Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE).” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 73, no. 1-4, Apr. 2014, pp. 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2.
Found error?