volume 73 issue 1-4 pages 509-519

Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE)

Farzad Rayegani 1
Godfrey C. Onwubolu 1
1
 
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Applied Science and Technology, Sheridan Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Brampton, Canada
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2014-04-25
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.706
CiteScore5.9
Impact factor3.1
ISSN02683768, 14333015
Computer Science Applications
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Software
Control and Systems Engineering
Abstract
This paper presents the research done to determine the functional relationship between process parameters and tensile strength for the fused deposition modelling (FDM) process using the group method for data modelling for prediction purposes. An initial test was carried out to determine whether part orientation and raster angle variations affect the tensile strength. It was found that both process parameters affect tensile strength response. Further experimentations were carried out in which the process parameters considered were part orientation, raster angle, raster width and air gap. The process parameters and the experimental results were submitted to the group method of data handling (GMDH), resulting in predicted output, in which the predicted output values were found to correlate very closely with the measured values. Using differential evolution (DE), optimal process parameters have been found to achieve good strength simultaneously for the response. The mathematical model of the response of the tensile strength with respect to the process parameters comprising part orientation, raster angle, raster width and air gap has been developed based on GMDH, and it has been found that the functionality of the additive manufacturing part produced is improved by optimizing the process parameters. The results obtained are very promising, and hence, the approach presented in this paper has practical application for the design and manufacture of parts using additive manufacturing technologies.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
22 publications, 7.89%
Rapid Prototyping Journal
16 publications, 5.73%
Materials Today: Proceedings
14 publications, 5.02%
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
12 publications, 4.3%
Additive Manufacturing
9 publications, 3.23%
Polymers
6 publications, 2.15%
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing
6 publications, 2.15%
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
6 publications, 2.15%
Materials
5 publications, 1.79%
Procedia Manufacturing
5 publications, 1.79%
Composites Part B: Engineering
4 publications, 1.43%
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
4 publications, 1.43%
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
3 publications, 1.08%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
3 publications, 1.08%
Advances in Manufacturing
3 publications, 1.08%
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
3 publications, 1.08%
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
3 publications, 1.08%
Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing
3 publications, 1.08%
Green Manufacturing Processes and Systems
3 publications, 1.08%
AIP Conference Proceedings
3 publications, 1.08%
MATEC Web of Conferences
2 publications, 0.72%
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
2 publications, 0.72%
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
2 publications, 0.72%
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
2 publications, 0.72%
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
2 publications, 0.72%
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
2 publications, 0.72%
Machines
2 publications, 0.72%
Crystals
2 publications, 0.72%
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
2 publications, 0.72%
5
10
15
20
25

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Springer Nature
82 publications, 29.39%
Elsevier
68 publications, 24.37%
MDPI
24 publications, 8.6%
Emerald
19 publications, 6.81%
SAGE
14 publications, 5.02%
Wiley
13 publications, 4.66%
IOP Publishing
11 publications, 3.94%
Taylor & Francis
7 publications, 2.51%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 publications, 2.15%
EDP Sciences
4 publications, 1.43%
AIP Publishing
4 publications, 1.43%
ASME International
3 publications, 1.08%
World Scientific
3 publications, 1.08%
Walter de Gruyter
3 publications, 1.08%
Mary Ann Liebert
2 publications, 0.72%
Scientific Research Publishing
2 publications, 0.72%
Research Square Platform LLC
2 publications, 0.72%
IWA Publishing
2 publications, 0.72%
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 publication, 0.36%
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
1 publication, 0.36%
ASTM International
1 publication, 0.36%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.36%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.36%
Institute of Technology and Production Management University of J.E. Purkyne
1 publication, 0.36%
OAE Publishing Inc.
1 publication, 0.36%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.36%
Lectito Publications
1 publication, 0.36%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
279
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Rayegani F., Onwubolu G. C. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE) // International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2014. Vol. 73. No. 1-4. pp. 509-519.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Rayegani F., Onwubolu G. C. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE) // International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2014. Vol. 73. No. 1-4. pp. 509-519.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2
TI - Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE)
T2 - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
AU - Rayegani, Farzad
AU - Onwubolu, Godfrey C.
PY - 2014
DA - 2014/04/25
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 509-519
IS - 1-4
VL - 73
SN - 0268-3768
SN - 1433-3015
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2014_Rayegani,
author = {Farzad Rayegani and Godfrey C. Onwubolu},
title = {Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE)},
journal = {International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology},
year = {2014},
volume = {73},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2},
number = {1-4},
pages = {509--519},
doi = {10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Rayegani, Farzad, and Godfrey C. Onwubolu. “Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE).” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 73, no. 1-4, Apr. 2014, pp. 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2.