Patients’ Perceptions of Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-02-11
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.778
CiteScore3.9
Impact factor1.8
ISSN09373462, 14333023
Abstract
Introduction and Hypothesis

Treatment options for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are often offered in a stepped-care approach. However, the shift towards patient-centred care and shared decision making (SDM) has prompted an increased interest in patients’ perceptions of treatment decision making. This scoping review maps the available qualitative research on women’s perceptions of the treatment decision-making process for SUI and identifies knowledge gaps.

Methods

This scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Three databases were searched using a systematic search strategy, without restriction in publication date or language. After thorough screening, 19 of the initial 3,473 publications were included.

Results

Four themes were identified; pre-existing experiences and notions that women bring to the consultations (things women consider before their consultation); treatment and patient characteristics (treatment aspects and personal values patients deem important); aspects of the consulting health care professional and facilities (availability of treatment options and counselling styles of physicians); ways of reaching a decision (three different ways that women used to make their decision. There were gaps in the literature on aspects affecting women’s treatment preferences, their preferred decision-making style and how they want to be involved in this decision-making process.

Conclusions

This scoping review provides a global overview of women’s perceptions on and preferences for treatment for SUI, and highlights a lack of knowledge on women’s ideas of the treatment decision process. To provide clinicians with better guidance for their counselling and decision-making approaches, studies on women’s perceptions of the decision-making process and the different decision-making styles are needed.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
International Urogynecology Journal
1 publication, 50%
Neurourology and Urodynamics
1 publication, 50%
1

Publishers

1
Springer Nature
1 publication, 50%
Wiley
1 publication, 50%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
2
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Osse N. et al. Patients’ Perceptions of Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies // International Urogynecology Journal. 2025.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Osse N., Engberts M. K., van Eijndhoven H. W., Brand P. W., Blanker M. Patients’ Perceptions of Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies // International Urogynecology Journal. 2025.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00192-025-06061-w
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-025-06061-w
TI - Patients’ Perceptions of Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies
T2 - International Urogynecology Journal
AU - Osse, Nienke
AU - Engberts, Marian K
AU - van Eijndhoven, Hugo W.F.
AU - Brand, Paul W.
AU - Blanker, Marco
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/02/11
PB - Springer Nature
SN - 0937-3462
SN - 1433-3023
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Osse,
author = {Nienke Osse and Marian K Engberts and Hugo W.F. van Eijndhoven and Paul W. Brand and Marco Blanker},
title = {Patients’ Perceptions of Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies},
journal = {International Urogynecology Journal},
year = {2025},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {feb},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-025-06061-w},
doi = {10.1007/s00192-025-06061-w}
}