Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, volume 402, issue 5, pages 1813-1826

Advances in organic transistor-based biosensors: from organic electrochemical transistors to electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors

Loïg Kergoat 1, 2
Benoit Piro 2
Magnus Berggren 1
Gilles Horowitz 2, 3
Minh‐Chau Pham 2
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2011-09-11
Quartile SCImago
Q2
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor4.3
ISSN16182642, 16182650
Biochemistry
Analytical Chemistry
Abstract
AbstractOrganic electronics have, over the past two decades, developed into an exciting area of research and technology to replace classic inorganic semiconductors. Organic photovoltaics, light-emitting diodes, and thin-film transistors are already well developed and are currently being commercialized for a variety of applications. More recently, organic transistors have found new applications in the field of biosensors. The progress made in this direction is the topic of this review. Various configurations are presented, with their detection principle, and illustrated by examples from the literature. FigureElectrolyte-Gated OFET (EGOFET) architecture. EGOFETs differ from OFETs, as in OECTs, in that the gate is separated from the semiconductor by an electrolyte. This allows low voltage operation compared with OFETs gated via solid dielectrics. The red circle indicates the interface involved in the detection of biomolecules, when water is used as electrolyte.

Top-30

Citations by journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
Advanced Materials
12 publications, 4.98%
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
10 publications, 4.15%
Organic Electronics
10 publications, 4.15%
Advanced Electronic Materials
10 publications, 4.15%
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
9 publications, 3.73%
Advanced Materials Technologies
6 publications, 2.49%
ACS applied materials & interfaces
6 publications, 2.49%
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
6 publications, 2.49%
Biosensors
5 publications, 2.07%
Scientific Reports
5 publications, 2.07%
Advanced Functional Materials
5 publications, 2.07%
Chemical Reviews
4 publications, 1.66%
Applied Physics Letters
4 publications, 1.66%
Sensors
4 publications, 1.66%
Nature Communications
4 publications, 1.66%
RSC Advances
4 publications, 1.66%
IEEE Sensors Journal
4 publications, 1.66%
Materials
3 publications, 1.24%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
3 publications, 1.24%
Micromachines
3 publications, 1.24%
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
3 publications, 1.24%
Electrochemical Science Advances
3 publications, 1.24%
Advanced Science
3 publications, 1.24%
Electronics (Switzerland)
2 publications, 0.83%
Nanomaterials
2 publications, 0.83%
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
2 publications, 0.83%
Russian Chemical Reviews
2 publications, 0.83%
Flexible and Printed Electronics
2 publications, 0.83%
Electrochimica Acta
2 publications, 0.83%
2
4
6
8
10
12

Citations by publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Wiley
63 publications, 26.14%
Elsevier
33 publications, 13.69%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
28 publications, 11.62%
Springer Nature
24 publications, 9.96%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
23 publications, 9.54%
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
23 publications, 9.54%
IEEE
10 publications, 4.15%
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
7 publications, 2.9%
IOP Publishing
4 publications, 1.66%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
2 publications, 0.83%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 0.41%
SPIE
1 publication, 0.41%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 0.41%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.41%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 0.41%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 0.41%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.41%
SAGE
1 publication, 0.41%
Trans Tech Publications
1 publication, 0.41%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Kergoat L. et al. Advances in organic transistor-based biosensors: from organic electrochemical transistors to electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors // Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2011. Vol. 402. No. 5. pp. 1813-1826.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Kergoat L., Piro B., Berggren M., Horowitz G., Pham M. Advances in organic transistor-based biosensors: from organic electrochemical transistors to electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors // Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2011. Vol. 402. No. 5. pp. 1813-1826.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00216-011-5363-y
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5363-y
TI - Advances in organic transistor-based biosensors: from organic electrochemical transistors to electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors
T2 - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
AU - Kergoat, Loïg
AU - Piro, Benoit
AU - Berggren, Magnus
AU - Horowitz, Gilles
AU - Pham, Minh‐Chau
PY - 2011
DA - 2011/09/11 00:00:00
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 1813-1826
IS - 5
VL - 402
SN - 1618-2642
SN - 1618-2650
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2011_Kergoat,
author = {Loïg Kergoat and Benoit Piro and Magnus Berggren and Gilles Horowitz and Minh‐Chau Pham},
title = {Advances in organic transistor-based biosensors: from organic electrochemical transistors to electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors},
journal = {Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry},
year = {2011},
volume = {402},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5363-y},
number = {5},
pages = {1813--1826},
doi = {10.1007/s00216-011-5363-y}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Kergoat, Loïg, et al. “Advances in organic transistor-based biosensors: from organic electrochemical transistors to electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors.” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 402, no. 5, Sep. 2011, pp. 1813-1826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5363-y.
Found error?