Open Access
Open access
volume 32 issue 8 pages 5134-5143

Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis

JUNHAN PAN 1
Yufeng Tao 1
Xiaoping Chi 1, 2
Lili Yang 1
Yanci Zhao 1
Feng Chen 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-03-10
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.535
CiteScore10.7
Impact factor4.7
ISSN09387994, 14321084
General Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Abstract
The definition of washout in gadoxetate disodium–enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) is controversial. The current Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) defines washout only in the portal venous phase on Gd-EOB-MRI, leading to low diagnostic sensitivity for HCC. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-MRI using conventional (cWO) and modified (mWO) definitions of washout. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies published between January 1, 2010, and August 1, 2021, that compared the diagnostic performance of cWO and mWO for HCC. The mWOs added transition phase (TP) hypointensity (mWO-1), hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity (mWO-2), or both (mWO-3). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis. Ten comparative studies with 2391 patients were included. Compared to cWO, the overall mWO yielded significantly higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%, p = 0.00) and lower specificity (97% vs. 93%, p = 0.01) for diagnosing HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.90 and 0.94 for the cWO and mWO, respectively. Regarding the three types of mWOs, mWO-2 showed the highest sensitivity (85%) and specificity (96%) for diagnosing HCC. mWO-2 achieved the highest AUC (0.97), followed by mWO-1 (0.90), and mWO-3 (0.89). Average reviewer experience and scanner field strength were significantly associated with study heterogeneity (p < 0.05). Inclusion of TP and HBP hypointensity in the definition of washout improved the sensitivity with slightly lower specificity for diagnosing HCC in LI-RADS. • Compared to the conventional definition of washout, studies using a modified definition had higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%) but lower specificity (97% vs. 93%) in LI-RADS for the diagnosis of HCC. • Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may be a preferred alternative washout for HCC diagnosis with the highest area under the curve. • Studies with experienced reviewer or 3.0T MRI showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity for diagnosing HCC when using modified washout (p < 0.05).
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
European Radiology
2 publications, 18.18%
Portal Hypertension & Cirrhosis
1 publication, 9.09%
Radiology
1 publication, 9.09%
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology
1 publication, 9.09%
Current Chinese Science
1 publication, 9.09%
Abdominal Radiology
1 publication, 9.09%
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
1 publication, 9.09%
Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment
1 publication, 9.09%
World Journal of Radiology
1 publication, 9.09%
BMC Gastroenterology
1 publication, 9.09%
1
2

Publishers

1
2
3
4
Springer Nature
4 publications, 36.36%
Baishideng Publishing Group
2 publications, 18.18%
Wiley
1 publication, 9.09%
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
1 publication, 9.09%
Elsevier
1 publication, 9.09%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 9.09%
SAGE
1 publication, 9.09%
1
2
3
4
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
11
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
PAN J. et al. Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis // European Radiology. 2022. Vol. 32. No. 8. pp. 5134-5143.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
PAN J., Tao Y., Chi X., Yang L., Zhao Y., Chen F. Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis // European Radiology. 2022. Vol. 32. No. 8. pp. 5134-5143.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00330-022-08665-y
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08665-y
TI - Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis
T2 - European Radiology
AU - PAN, JUNHAN
AU - Tao, Yufeng
AU - Chi, Xiaoping
AU - Yang, Lili
AU - Zhao, Yanci
AU - Chen, Feng
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/03/10
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 5134-5143
IS - 8
VL - 32
PMID - 35267090
SN - 0938-7994
SN - 1432-1084
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_PAN,
author = {JUNHAN PAN and Yufeng Tao and Xiaoping Chi and Lili Yang and Yanci Zhao and Feng Chen},
title = {Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
journal = {European Radiology},
year = {2022},
volume = {32},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08665-y},
number = {8},
pages = {5134--5143},
doi = {10.1007/s00330-022-08665-y}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
PAN, JUNHAN, et al. “Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” European Radiology, vol. 32, no. 8, Mar. 2022, pp. 5134-5143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08665-y.