Artificial Intelligence models for prediction of the tide level in Venice
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2021-04-09
SJR: —
CiteScore: —
Impact factor: —
ISSN: 14363240, 14363259
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Engineering
General Environmental Science
Water Science and Technology
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Abstract
The city of Venice is an extraordinary architectural, artistic and cultural heritage. Unfortunately, its conservation is increasingly threatened by particularly significant high tides. Predicting the tide level in Venice, especially the high waters, is an essential task for the protection of the city and the lagoon. Complex statistical or hydrodynamic models, which require a large amount of input data, are currently used for this purpose. An effective alternative can be provided by models based on Artificial Intelligence algorithms. In this study, several different forecasting models were developed and each model was built in three variants, varying the implemented machine learning algorithm: M5P Regression Tree, Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron. Until now, regression tree models had never been used to forecast tide levels. All the proposed models proved to be able to forecast the tide level in Venice with good accuracy. The M5P algorithm provided the best performance in most cases. All the models based on M5P were characterized by a coefficient of determination between 0.924 and 0.996, while the Relative Absolute Error was between 5.98 and 26.84%. In addition, good predictions were achieved by neglecting meteorological factors, even in the case of exceptionally high waters. Finally, satisfactory outcomes were also obtained with a forecast horizon of several hours, while a further specific comparison showed that the models based on the considered Machine Learning algorithms are able to outperform the AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average models with exogenous input variables in forecasting high water.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
5 publications, 8.77%
|
|
|
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
4 publications, 7.02%
|
|
|
Atmosphere
4 publications, 7.02%
|
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
3 publications, 5.26%
|
|
|
Sustainability
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Remote Sensing
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Journal of Hydrology
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Ocean Engineering
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
World Wide Web
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Engineering Structures
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Agricultural Water Management
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Environments - MDPI
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Water Resources Management
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Heritage
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Ocean Science
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Fire
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Journal of Earth System Science
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Continental Shelf Research
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Water and Wastewater Management
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishers
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
|
MDPI
19 publications, 33.33%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
17 publications, 29.82%
|
|
|
Elsevier
11 publications, 19.3%
|
|
|
Emerald
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
IWA Publishing
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Ain Shams University
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Copernicus
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
57
Total citations:
57
Citations from 2024:
18
(31.58%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Granata F., Di Nunno F. Artificial Intelligence models for prediction of the tide level in Venice // Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 2021. Vol. 35. No. 12. pp. 2537-2548.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Granata F., Di Nunno F. Artificial Intelligence models for prediction of the tide level in Venice // Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 2021. Vol. 35. No. 12. pp. 2537-2548.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s00477-021-02018-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02018-9
TI - Artificial Intelligence models for prediction of the tide level in Venice
T2 - Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
AU - Granata, Francesco
AU - Di Nunno, Fabio
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/04/09
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 2537-2548
IS - 12
VL - 35
SN - 1436-3240
SN - 1436-3259
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2021_Granata,
author = {Francesco Granata and Fabio Di Nunno},
title = {Artificial Intelligence models for prediction of the tide level in Venice},
journal = {Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment},
year = {2021},
volume = {35},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02018-9},
number = {12},
pages = {2537--2548},
doi = {10.1007/s00477-021-02018-9}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Granata, Francesco, and Fabio Di Nunno. “Artificial Intelligence models for prediction of the tide level in Venice.” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol. 35, no. 12, Apr. 2021, pp. 2537-2548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02018-9.