volume 37 issue 5 pages 847-857

Catching the red eye: field evidence that artificial prey with red eye-like markings are preferentially avoided by avian predators

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-09-01
scimago Q2
wos Q3
SJR0.645
CiteScore3.2
Impact factor2.1
ISSN02697653, 15738477
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Abstract
Calyptrate muscoids (Diptera: Schizophora) are globally distributed flies and among the most maneuverable of flying insects. A salient feature of many calyptrate species is their large red eyes. Given their abundance and evasiveness, it has been postulated that birds might learn to associate the red eye trait with difficulty of capture, and subsequently avoid this prey type. This hypothesis is strengthened by the observation that many arthropods, from spiders to weevils, appear to have evolved a resemblance to calyptrates, including their prominent red eyes. To test the hypothesis directly we pinned 1000 artificial beetles with grey and red eyes onto trees over three separate transects and inspected them 26 days later. As predicted, there was over twice the predation on grey-eyed beetles than red-eyed beetles. The implications of this result are discussed, including how one could quantify the ecological and phylogenetic association between a signaller’s red eyes and its evasiveness.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Biology Letters
1 publication, 25%
American Naturalist
1 publication, 25%
Austral Ecology
1 publication, 25%
Ethology Ecology and Evolution
1 publication, 25%
1

Publishers

1
The Royal Society
1 publication, 25%
University of Chicago Press
1 publication, 25%
Wiley
1 publication, 25%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 25%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
4
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Loeffler-Henry K., Sherratt T. N. Catching the red eye: field evidence that artificial prey with red eye-like markings are preferentially avoided by avian predators // Evolutionary Ecology. 2023. Vol. 37. No. 5. pp. 847-857.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Loeffler-Henry K., Sherratt T. N. Catching the red eye: field evidence that artificial prey with red eye-like markings are preferentially avoided by avian predators // Evolutionary Ecology. 2023. Vol. 37. No. 5. pp. 847-857.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s10682-023-10254-4
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10254-4
TI - Catching the red eye: field evidence that artificial prey with red eye-like markings are preferentially avoided by avian predators
T2 - Evolutionary Ecology
AU - Loeffler-Henry, Karl
AU - Sherratt, Thomas N.
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/09/01
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 847-857
IS - 5
VL - 37
SN - 0269-7653
SN - 1573-8477
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2023_Loeffler-Henry,
author = {Karl Loeffler-Henry and Thomas N. Sherratt},
title = {Catching the red eye: field evidence that artificial prey with red eye-like markings are preferentially avoided by avian predators},
journal = {Evolutionary Ecology},
year = {2023},
volume = {37},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10254-4},
number = {5},
pages = {847--857},
doi = {10.1007/s10682-023-10254-4}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Loeffler-Henry, Karl, and Thomas N. Sherratt. “Catching the red eye: field evidence that artificial prey with red eye-like markings are preferentially avoided by avian predators.” Evolutionary Ecology, vol. 37, no. 5, Sep. 2023, pp. 847-857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10254-4.