volume 9 issue 5 pages 777-785

Enantiomeric PLA–PEG block copolymers and their stereocomplex micelles used as rifampin delivery

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2006-07-28
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.469
CiteScore4.0
Impact factor2.6
ISSN13880764, 1572896X
General Chemistry
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Condensed Matter Physics
General Materials Science
Bioengineering
Modeling and Simulation
Abstract
A novelty approach to self-assembling stereocomplex micelles by enantiomeric PLA–PEG block copolymers as a drug delivery carrier was described. The particles were encapsulated by enantiomeric PLA–PEG stereocomplex to form nanoscale micelles different from the microspheres or the single micelles by PLLA or PDLA in the reported literatures. First, the block copolymers of enantiomeric poly(l-lactide)–poly(ethylene–glycol) (PLLA–PEG) and poly(D-lactide)–poly(ethylene–glycol) (PDLA–PEG) were synthesized by the ring-opening polymerization of l-lactide and d-lactide in the presence of monomethoxy PEG, respectively. Second, the stereocomplex block copolymer micelles were obtained by the self-assembly of the equimolar mixtures of enantiomeric PLA–PEG copolymers in water. These micelles possessed partially the crystallized hydrophobic cores with the critical micelle concentrations (cmc) in the range of 0.8–4.8 mg/l and the mean hydrodynamic diameters ranging from 40 to 120 nm. The micelle sizes and cmc values obviously depended on the hydrophobic block PLA content in the copolymer. Compared with the single PLLA–PEG or PDLA–PEG micelles, the cmc values of the stereocomplex micelles became lower and the sizes of the stereocomplex micelles formed smaller. And lastly, the stereocomplex micelles encapsulated with rifampin were tested for the controlled release application. The rifampin loading capacity and encapsulation efficiency by the stereocomplex micelles were higher than those by the single polymer micelles, respectively. The drug release time in vitro was depending on the composites of the block copolymers and also could be controlled by the polymer molecular weight and the morphology of the polymer micelles.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
4 publications, 3.64%
Macromolecules
4 publications, 3.64%
Biomacromolecules
4 publications, 3.64%
RSC Advances
4 publications, 3.64%
Polymer
3 publications, 2.73%
European Polymer Journal
3 publications, 2.73%
Macromolecular Rapid Communications
3 publications, 2.73%
Langmuir
3 publications, 2.73%
Polymers
2 publications, 1.82%
AAPS PharmSciTech
2 publications, 1.82%
Journal of Nanoparticle Research
2 publications, 1.82%
Journal of Molecular Liquids
2 publications, 1.82%
Journal of Controlled Release
2 publications, 1.82%
Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics
2 publications, 1.82%
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
2 publications, 1.82%
Macromolecular Bioscience
2 publications, 1.82%
Chemical Communications
2 publications, 1.82%
Chemical Science
2 publications, 1.82%
Soft Matter
2 publications, 1.82%
Current Pharmaceutical Design
1 publication, 0.91%
Current Drug Delivery
1 publication, 0.91%
Mendeleev Communications
1 publication, 0.91%
Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
1 publication, 0.91%
Materials
1 publication, 0.91%
Nanomaterials
1 publication, 0.91%
Molecules
1 publication, 0.91%
Nano Research
1 publication, 0.91%
Polymer Journal
1 publication, 0.91%
Chinese Journal of Polymer Science (English Edition)
1 publication, 0.91%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Elsevier
32 publications, 29.09%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
17 publications, 15.45%
Wiley
14 publications, 12.73%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
13 publications, 11.82%
Springer Nature
11 publications, 10%
MDPI
6 publications, 5.45%
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 3.64%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 publications, 1.82%
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
1 publication, 0.91%
Assoc Nonwoven Fabrics Ind
1 publication, 0.91%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 0.91%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.91%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.91%
Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering
1 publication, 0.91%
IMR Press
1 publication, 0.91%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 0.91%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
110
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Chen L. et al. Enantiomeric PLA–PEG block copolymers and their stereocomplex micelles used as rifampin delivery // Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2006. Vol. 9. No. 5. pp. 777-785.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Chen L., Xie Z., HU J., Chen X., Jing X. Enantiomeric PLA–PEG block copolymers and their stereocomplex micelles used as rifampin delivery // Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2006. Vol. 9. No. 5. pp. 777-785.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s11051-006-9103-8
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9103-8
TI - Enantiomeric PLA–PEG block copolymers and their stereocomplex micelles used as rifampin delivery
T2 - Journal of Nanoparticle Research
AU - Chen, Li
AU - Xie, Zhigang
AU - HU, JUNLI
AU - Chen, Xuesi
AU - Jing, Xiabin
PY - 2006
DA - 2006/07/28
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 777-785
IS - 5
VL - 9
SN - 1388-0764
SN - 1572-896X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2006_Chen,
author = {Li Chen and Zhigang Xie and JUNLI HU and Xuesi Chen and Xiabin Jing},
title = {Enantiomeric PLA–PEG block copolymers and their stereocomplex micelles used as rifampin delivery},
journal = {Journal of Nanoparticle Research},
year = {2006},
volume = {9},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9103-8},
number = {5},
pages = {777--785},
doi = {10.1007/s11051-006-9103-8}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Chen, Li, et al. “Enantiomeric PLA–PEG block copolymers and their stereocomplex micelles used as rifampin delivery.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 9, no. 5, Jul. 2006, pp. 777-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9103-8.