A Hybrid Model Combining the Cama-Flood Model and Deep Learning Methods for Streamflow Prediction
Ming Zhong
1, 2
,
Hongrui Zhang
2
,
Tao Jiang
2
,
Jun Guo
3
,
Jinxin Zhu
2
,
Dagang Wang
2
,
Xiaohong Chen
4
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2023-08-22
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.048
CiteScore: 8.4
Impact factor: 4.7
ISSN: 09204741, 15731650
Civil and Structural Engineering
Water Science and Technology
Abstract
Climate warming will accelerate the global hydrological cycle and intensify the risk of extreme precipitation and floods. Accurate and reliable streamflow forecasting is fundamental to flood risk mitigation. In this study, we develop a streamflow prediction model by coupling physics-based models, namely, the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) and catchment-based macroscale floodplain (CaMa-Flood) models, with deep learning methods, i.e., the recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM), which complement physics-based models. Two hybrid models, namely, the VIC-CaMa-Flood-RNN (VCR) and VIC-CaMa-Flood-LSTM (VCL) models, are established that provide the advantages of both physics-based and data-driven models. The results show that (1) the VCL model achieves the best performance among the proposed models in streamflow and flood prediction. It outperforms the VCR model, with a potential increase of up to 4.94% in Nash Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) and 1.18% in correlation coefficient (R), as well as an improvement of 15.8% in the maximum flood volumes (MAX). (2) in this study, we investigate the actual contribution of various input features (precipitation, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and wind speed) to the hybrid model-simulated streamflow. The results show that the minimum temperature is the most significant feature, followed by precipitation, maximum temperature, and wind speed. When the maximum and minimum temperatures are considered as temperature features, temperature and precipitation are the most important features affecting the hybrid model-simulated streamflow, with the actual contribution exceeding 80%. (3) during the 2040 and 2090 s, considering the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, the monthly average streamflow will increase with increasing temperature, and flood seasons will be prolonged. This study is a novel attempt to couple physics-based and data-driven models, which can further improve the streamflow and flood prediction accuracy and provide reliable support for future flood risk assessments.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Water Resources Management
3 publications, 15.79%
|
|
|
Hydrological Sciences Journal
2 publications, 10.53%
|
|
|
Journal of Hydrology
2 publications, 10.53%
|
|
|
Environmental Modelling and Software
2 publications, 10.53%
|
|
|
Sustainability
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Environmental Modeling and Assessment
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Journal of Hydroinformatics
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
Advances in Water Resources
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
|
|
Elsevier
9 publications, 47.37%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
4 publications, 21.05%
|
|
|
MDPI
2 publications, 10.53%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 10.53%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
IWA Publishing
1 publication, 5.26%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
19
Total citations:
19
Citations from 2024:
18
(94.74%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Zhong M. et al. A Hybrid Model Combining the Cama-Flood Model and Deep Learning Methods for Streamflow Prediction // Water Resources Management. 2023. Vol. 37. No. 12. pp. 4841-4859.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Zhong M., Zhang H., Jiang T., Guo J., Zhu J., Wang D., Chen X. A Hybrid Model Combining the Cama-Flood Model and Deep Learning Methods for Streamflow Prediction // Water Resources Management. 2023. Vol. 37. No. 12. pp. 4841-4859.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s11269-023-03583-0
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03583-0
TI - A Hybrid Model Combining the Cama-Flood Model and Deep Learning Methods for Streamflow Prediction
T2 - Water Resources Management
AU - Zhong, Ming
AU - Zhang, Hongrui
AU - Jiang, Tao
AU - Guo, Jun
AU - Zhu, Jinxin
AU - Wang, Dagang
AU - Chen, Xiaohong
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/08/22
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 4841-4859
IS - 12
VL - 37
SN - 0920-4741
SN - 1573-1650
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2023_Zhong,
author = {Ming Zhong and Hongrui Zhang and Tao Jiang and Jun Guo and Jinxin Zhu and Dagang Wang and Xiaohong Chen},
title = {A Hybrid Model Combining the Cama-Flood Model and Deep Learning Methods for Streamflow Prediction},
journal = {Water Resources Management},
year = {2023},
volume = {37},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03583-0},
number = {12},
pages = {4841--4859},
doi = {10.1007/s11269-023-03583-0}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Zhong, Ming, et al. “A Hybrid Model Combining the Cama-Flood Model and Deep Learning Methods for Streamflow Prediction.” Water Resources Management, vol. 37, no. 12, Aug. 2023, pp. 4841-4859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03583-0.