Current evidence in the management of previous caesarean section: clinical review
1
Women’s Health Directorate, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Lancashire, UK
|
2
Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK
|
3
Burnley General Hospital, Burnley, UK
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2007-06-16
SJR: —
CiteScore: —
Impact factor: —
ISSN: 16133412, 16133420
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract
The safety of women undergoing childbirth with prior caesarean delivery is a major public health concern. Most of the earlier studies focused on the success rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section; later focus shifted to maternal and neonatal safety, and presently, each factor that would influence the outcome of trial of labour is being considered on both the success and the safety of vaginal birth following caesarean delivery. The contribution of induction of labour to uterine rupture is not entirely clear. Although large multi-center randomised trials comparing planned elective repeat caesarean delivery vs vaginal delivery following prior caesarean delivery are required for conclusive evidence; current evidence suggests that, in properly selected women, vaginal birth can be safely achieved if adequate facilities to monitor the foetus and immediate caesarean can be performed. Unbiased evidence-based information should be given to patients in making decisions about mode of delivery based on individual characteristics. The purpose of this review is to understand each factor that would influence the success and safety of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine
1 publication, 100%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
|
|
|
AOSIS
1 publication, 100%
|
|
|
1
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1
Total citations:
1
Citations from 2024:
0
The most citing journal
Citations in journal:
1
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Muppala H., Najia S. K., Clarke F. Current evidence in the management of previous caesarean section: clinical review // European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2007. Vol. 3. No. 2. pp. 67-80.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Muppala H., Najia S. K., Clarke F. Current evidence in the management of previous caesarean section: clinical review // European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2007. Vol. 3. No. 2. pp. 67-80.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s11296-007-0065-x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11296-007-0065-x
TI - Current evidence in the management of previous caesarean section: clinical review
T2 - European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
AU - Muppala, H
AU - Najia, S K
AU - Clarke, F.R.
PY - 2007
DA - 2007/06/16
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 67-80
IS - 2
VL - 3
SN - 1613-3412
SN - 1613-3420
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2007_Muppala,
author = {H Muppala and S K Najia and F.R. Clarke},
title = {Current evidence in the management of previous caesarean section: clinical review},
journal = {European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology},
year = {2007},
volume = {3},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11296-007-0065-x},
number = {2},
pages = {67--80},
doi = {10.1007/s11296-007-0065-x}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Muppala, H., et al. “Current evidence in the management of previous caesarean section: clinical review.” European Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 3, no. 2, Jun. 2007, pp. 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11296-007-0065-x.