volume 32 issue 2 pages 173-205

Comparing China and India’s Disputed Borderland Regions: Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir, and the Indian Northeast

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2015-05-12
scimago Q2
wos Q1
SJR0.421
CiteScore2.9
Impact factor1.1
ISSN10966838, 18746284
Geography, Planning and Development
Political Science and International Relations
Development
Abstract
The paper tries to make an assessment of the borderland regions of China and India with a focus on Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir and the Indian Northeast. The paper looks at the conflict in India and China's periphery, how these conflicts have evolved with time and how they have changed their character with the passage of time, from the 1950s until the present day. After looking at some background, the paper primarily focusses on three key issues which impact on all four of the conflicts: the rise of ethnic nationalism, the impact of external forces on the conflict and the human rights situation. After making an assessment of the political situation, the paper looks at the areas of similarity and differences between the four regions. Methodologically, a bottom-up approach was taken and in-depth unstructured interviews were carried out with people from the conflict zones that the paper considers.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Issues and Studies
1 publication, 50%
Journal of Borderlands Studies
1 publication, 50%
1

Publishers

1
World Scientific
1 publication, 50%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 50%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
2
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Mukherjee K. Comparing China and India’s Disputed Borderland Regions: Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir, and the Indian Northeast // East Asia. 2015. Vol. 32. No. 2. pp. 173-205.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Mukherjee K. Comparing China and India’s Disputed Borderland Regions: Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir, and the Indian Northeast // East Asia. 2015. Vol. 32. No. 2. pp. 173-205.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s12140-015-9231-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9231-9
TI - Comparing China and India’s Disputed Borderland Regions: Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir, and the Indian Northeast
T2 - East Asia
AU - Mukherjee, Kunal
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/05/12
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 173-205
IS - 2
VL - 32
SN - 1096-6838
SN - 1874-6284
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2015_Mukherjee,
author = {Kunal Mukherjee},
title = {Comparing China and India’s Disputed Borderland Regions: Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir, and the Indian Northeast},
journal = {East Asia},
year = {2015},
volume = {32},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9231-9},
number = {2},
pages = {173--205},
doi = {10.1007/s12140-015-9231-9}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Mukherjee, Kunal. “Comparing China and India’s Disputed Borderland Regions: Xinjiang, Tibet, Kashmir, and the Indian Northeast.” East Asia, vol. 32, no. 2, May. 2015, pp. 173-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9231-9.