Open Access
Open access
Metals and Materials International, volume 25, issue 5, pages 1312-1325

3D Printed Parts with Honeycomb Internal Pattern by Fused Deposition Modelling; Experimental Characterization and Production Optimization

Mahmoud Moradi 1
Saleh Meiabadi 2
Alexander Kaplan 3
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-04-19
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor3.3
ISSN15989623, 20054149
Materials Chemistry
Metals and Alloys
Condensed Matter Physics
Mechanics of Materials
Abstract
In the present study additive manufacturing of Polylactic acid by fused deposition modeling were investigated based on statistical analysis. The honeycomb internal pattern was employed to build inside of specimens due to its remarkable capability to resist mechanical loads. Simplify 3D was utilized to slice the 3D model and to adjust fixed parameters. Layer thickness, infill percentage, and extruder temperature were considered as controlled variables, while maximum failure load (N), elongation at break (mm), part weight (g), and build time (min) were selected as output responses and analysed by response surface method. Analysis of variance results identified layer thickness as the major controlled variable for all responses. Interaction of infill percentage and extruder temperature had a significant influence on elongation at break and therefore, tough fracture of printed parts. The input parameters were optimized to materialize tow criteria; the first one was to rise maximum failure load and the second was to attain tough fracture and lessen build time and part weight at a time. Optimal solutions were examined by experimental fabrication to evaluate the efficiency of the optimization method. There was a good agreement between empirical results and response surface method predictions which confirmed the reliability of predictive models. The optimal setting to fulfill the first criterion could bring on a specimen with more than 1500 (N) maximum failure load and less than 9 (g) weight.

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Polymers
7 publications, 12.28%
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
5 publications, 8.77%
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
2 publications, 3.51%
Optik
2 publications, 3.51%
Materials Today: Proceedings
2 publications, 3.51%
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
2 publications, 3.51%
Composite Structures
2 publications, 3.51%
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME
1 publication, 1.75%
Symmetry
1 publication, 1.75%
Journal of Composites Science
1 publication, 1.75%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 1.75%
Buildings
1 publication, 1.75%
Advances in Manufacturing
1 publication, 1.75%
Welding in the World, Le Soudage Dans Le Monde
1 publication, 1.75%
Applied Thermal Engineering
1 publication, 1.75%
Thin-Walled Structures
1 publication, 1.75%
Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research
1 publication, 1.75%
Computers in Industry
1 publication, 1.75%
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1 publication, 1.75%
Materials Research Express
1 publication, 1.75%
Smart Materials and Structures
1 publication, 1.75%
Optics and Laser Technology
1 publication, 1.75%
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
1 publication, 1.75%
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
1 publication, 1.75%
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
1 publication, 1.75%
Diffusion Foundations and Materials Applications
1 publication, 1.75%
Materials Science Forum
1 publication, 1.75%
Advanced Structured Materials
1 publication, 1.75%
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
1 publication, 1.75%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Springer Nature
15 publications, 26.32%
Elsevier
14 publications, 24.56%
MDPI
12 publications, 21.05%
IOP Publishing
3 publications, 5.26%
SAGE
3 publications, 5.26%
Trans Tech Publications
2 publications, 3.51%
ASME International
1 publication, 1.75%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 1.75%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.75%
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
1 publication, 1.75%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Moradi M., Meiabadi S., Kaplan A. 3D Printed Parts with Honeycomb Internal Pattern by Fused Deposition Modelling; Experimental Characterization and Production Optimization // Metals and Materials International. 2019. Vol. 25. No. 5. pp. 1312-1325.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Moradi M., Meiabadi S., Kaplan A. 3D Printed Parts with Honeycomb Internal Pattern by Fused Deposition Modelling; Experimental Characterization and Production Optimization // Metals and Materials International. 2019. Vol. 25. No. 5. pp. 1312-1325.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s12540-019-00272-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00272-9
TI - 3D Printed Parts with Honeycomb Internal Pattern by Fused Deposition Modelling; Experimental Characterization and Production Optimization
T2 - Metals and Materials International
AU - Moradi, Mahmoud
AU - Meiabadi, Saleh
AU - Kaplan, Alexander
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/04/19
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 1312-1325
IS - 5
VL - 25
SN - 1598-9623
SN - 2005-4149
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2019_Moradi,
author = {Mahmoud Moradi and Saleh Meiabadi and Alexander Kaplan},
title = {3D Printed Parts with Honeycomb Internal Pattern by Fused Deposition Modelling; Experimental Characterization and Production Optimization},
journal = {Metals and Materials International},
year = {2019},
volume = {25},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00272-9},
number = {5},
pages = {1312--1325},
doi = {10.1007/s12540-019-00272-9}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Moradi, Mahmoud, et al. “3D Printed Parts with Honeycomb Internal Pattern by Fused Deposition Modelling; Experimental Characterization and Production Optimization.” Metals and Materials International, vol. 25, no. 5, Apr. 2019, pp. 1312-1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00272-9.
Found error?