volume 10 issue 4 pages 327-336

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus standard of care for the treatment of critically ill hospitalised adults with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

E Wesley Ely 1, 2
Athimalaipet V Ramanan 3, 4
Cynthia E Kartman 5
Stephanie de Bono 5
RAN LIAO 5
Maria Lucia B Piruzeli 5
José Francisco Kerr Saraiva 6
Sujatro Chakladar 5
Vincent C. Marconi 7, 8
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-04-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR6.788
CiteScore53.2
Impact factor32.8
ISSN22132600, 22132619
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Abstract

Summary

Background

The oral, selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor baricitinib has shown efficacy in studies of hospitalised adults with COVID-19. COV-BARRIER (NCT04421027) was a multinational, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of baricitinib in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus standard of care in critically ill hospitalised adults with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Methods

This exploratory trial followed the study design of COV-BARRIER in a critically ill cohort not included in the main phase 3 trial. The study was conducted across 18 hospitals in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and the USA. Participants (aged ≥18 years) hospitalised with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection on baseline invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were randomly assigned (1:1) to baricitinib (4 mg) or placebo once daily for up to 14 days in combination with standard of care. Participants, study staff, and investigators were masked to study group assignment. Prespecified endpoints included all-cause mortality through days 28 and 60, number of ventilator-free days, duration of hospitalisation, and time to recovery through day 28. The efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and the safety analysis was done in the safety population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04421027.

Findings

Between Dec 23, 2020, and April 10, 2021, 101 participants were enrolled into the exploratory trial and assigned to baricitinib (n=51) or placebo (n=50) plus standard of care. Standard of care included baseline systemic corticosteroid use in 87 (86%) participants. Treatment with baricitinib significantly reduced 28-day all-cause mortality compared with placebo (20 [39%] of 51 participants died in the baricitinib group vs 29 [58%] of 50 in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·54 [95% CI 0·31–0·96]; p=0·030; 46% relative reduction; absolute risk reduction 19%). A significant reduction in 60-day mortality was also observed in the baricitinib group compared with the placebo group (23 [45%] events vs 31 [62%]; HR 0·56 [95% CI 0·33–0·97]; p=0·027; 44% relative reduction; absolute risk reduction 17%). In every six baricitinib-treated participants, one additional death was prevented compared with placebo at days 28 and 60. The number of ventilator-free days did not differ significantly between treatment groups (mean 8·1 days [SD 10·2] in the baricitinib group vs 5·5 days [8·4] in the placebo group; p=0·21). The mean duration of hospitalisation in baricitinib-treated participants was not significantly shorter than in placebo-treated participants (23·7 days [SD 7·1] vs 26·1 days [3·9]; p=0·050). The rates of infections, blood clots, and adverse cardiovascular events were similar between treatment groups.

Interpretation

In critically ill hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, treatment with baricitinib compared with placebo (in combination with standard of care, including corticosteroids) reduced mortality, which is consistent with the mortality reduction observed in less severely ill patients in the hospitalised primary COV-BARRIER study population. However, this was an exploratory trial with a relatively small sample size; therefore, further phase 3 trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Frontiers in Immunology
5 publications, 3.14%
Critical Care Medicine
5 publications, 3.14%
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
5 publications, 3.14%
Viruses
4 publications, 2.52%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
4 publications, 2.52%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
3 publications, 1.89%
Life
3 publications, 1.89%
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
3 publications, 1.89%
Medicine (United States)
2 publications, 1.26%
Vaccines
2 publications, 1.26%
Biomedicines
2 publications, 1.26%
Frontiers in Medicine
2 publications, 1.26%
Inflammation and Regeneration
2 publications, 1.26%
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
2 publications, 1.26%
EBioMedicine
2 publications, 1.26%
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
2 publications, 1.26%
Clinical Infectious Diseases
2 publications, 1.26%
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
2 publications, 1.26%
Biomarkers in Toxicology
2 publications, 1.26%
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
2 publications, 1.26%
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
2 publications, 1.26%
Cureus
2 publications, 1.26%
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
2 publications, 1.26%
Journal of Molecular Liquids
1 publication, 0.63%
JAMA network open
1 publication, 0.63%
HRB Open Research
1 publication, 0.63%
Inflammopharmacology
1 publication, 0.63%
Die Gastroenterologie
1 publication, 0.63%
World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery
1 publication, 0.63%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Elsevier
32 publications, 20.13%
Springer Nature
30 publications, 18.87%
MDPI
19 publications, 11.95%
Frontiers Media S.A.
13 publications, 8.18%
Wiley
12 publications, 7.55%
Oxford University Press
8 publications, 5.03%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
7 publications, 4.4%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
6 publications, 3.77%
SAGE
4 publications, 2.52%
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 2.52%
American Medical Association (AMA)
2 publications, 1.26%
Research Square Platform LLC
2 publications, 1.26%
F1000 Research
1 publication, 0.63%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 0.63%
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.63%
SPb RAACI
1 publication, 0.63%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 publication, 0.63%
Medknow
1 publication, 0.63%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 0.63%
American Scientific Publishers
1 publication, 0.63%
American Thoracic Society
1 publication, 0.63%
American Society for Microbiology
1 publication, 0.63%
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
1 publication, 0.63%
American College of Physicians
1 publication, 0.63%
American Academy of Pediatrics
1 publication, 0.63%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
159
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Ely E. W. et al. Efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus standard of care for the treatment of critically ill hospitalised adults with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled trial // The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2022. Vol. 10. No. 4. pp. 327-336.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Ely E. W., Ramanan A. V., Kartman C. E., de Bono S., LIAO R., Piruzeli M. L. B., Saraiva J. F. K., Chakladar S., Marconi V. C. Efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus standard of care for the treatment of critically ill hospitalised adults with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled trial // The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2022. Vol. 10. No. 4. pp. 327-336.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00006-6
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213260022000066
TI - Efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus standard of care for the treatment of critically ill hospitalised adults with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled trial
T2 - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
AU - Ely, E Wesley
AU - Ramanan, Athimalaipet V
AU - Kartman, Cynthia E
AU - de Bono, Stephanie
AU - LIAO, RAN
AU - Piruzeli, Maria Lucia B
AU - Saraiva, José Francisco Kerr
AU - Chakladar, Sujatro
AU - Marconi, Vincent C.
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/04/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 327-336
IS - 4
VL - 10
PMID - 35123660
SN - 2213-2600
SN - 2213-2619
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Ely,
author = {E Wesley Ely and Athimalaipet V Ramanan and Cynthia E Kartman and Stephanie de Bono and RAN LIAO and Maria Lucia B Piruzeli and José Francisco Kerr Saraiva and Sujatro Chakladar and Vincent C. Marconi},
title = {Efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus standard of care for the treatment of critically ill hospitalised adults with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled trial},
journal = {The Lancet Respiratory Medicine},
year = {2022},
volume = {10},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {apr},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213260022000066},
number = {4},
pages = {327--336},
doi = {10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00006-6}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Ely, E. Wesley, et al. “Efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus standard of care for the treatment of critically ill hospitalised adults with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.” The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, vol. 10, no. 4, Apr. 2022, pp. 327-336. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213260022000066.