Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic
Jonathan W. Rogers
1
,
Edward Chesney
2, 3
,
Dominic Oliver
4
,
T. A. Pollak
5, 6
,
Philip McGuire
4
,
Paolo Fusar-Poli
5, 7
,
M. S. Zandi
8, 9
,
Glyn Lewis
1
,
Anthony S. David
10
2
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
|
6
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2020-07-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 7.458
CiteScore: 44.3
Impact factor: 24.8
ISSN: 22150366, 22150374
PubMed ID:
32437679
Psychiatry and Mental health
Biological Psychiatry
Abstract
Summary
Background
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, coronaviruses caused two noteworthy outbreaks: severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), starting in 2002, and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), starting in 2012. We aimed to assess the psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations of SARS, MERS, and COVID-19.Methods
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases (from their inception until March 18, 2020), and medRxiv, bioRxiv, and PsyArXiv (between Jan 1, 2020, and April 10, 2020) were searched by two independent researchers for all English-language studies or preprints reporting data on the psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations of individuals with suspected or laboratory-confirmed coronavirus infection (SARS coronavirus, MERS coronavirus, or SARS coronavirus 2). We excluded studies limited to neurological complications without specified neuropsychiatric presentations and those investigating the indirect effects of coronavirus infections on the mental health of people who are not infected, such as those mediated through physical distancing measures such as self-isolation or quarantine. Outcomes were psychiatric signs or symptoms; symptom severity; diagnoses based on ICD-10, DSM-IV, or the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders (third edition) or psychometric scales; quality of life; and employment. Both the systematic review and the meta-analysis stratified outcomes across illness stages (acute vs post-illness) for SARS and MERS. We used a random-effects model for the meta-analysis, and the meta-analytical effect size was prevalence for relevant outcomes, I2 statistics, and assessment of study quality.Findings
1963 studies and 87 preprints were identified by the systematic search, of which 65 peer-reviewed studies and seven preprints met inclusion criteria. The number of coronavirus cases of the included studies was 3559, ranging from 1 to 997, and the mean age of participants in studies ranged from 12·2 years (SD 4·1) to 68·0 years (single case report). Studies were from China, Hong Kong, South Korea, Canada, Saudi Arabia, France, Japan, Singapore, the UK, and the USA. Follow-up time for the post-illness studies varied between 60 days and 12 years. The systematic review revealed that during the acute illness, common symptoms among patients admitted to hospital for SARS or MERS included confusion (36 [27·9%; 95% CI 20·5–36·0] of 129 patients), depressed mood (42 [32·6%; 24·7–40·9] of 129), anxiety (46 [35·7%; 27·6–44·2] of 129), impaired memory (44 [34·1%; 26·2–42·5] of 129), and insomnia (54 [41·9%; 22·5–50·5] of 129). Steroid-induced mania and psychosis were reported in 13 (0·7%) of 1744 patients with SARS in the acute stage in one study. In the post-illness stage, depressed mood (35 [10·5%; 95% CI 7·5–14·1] of 332 patients), insomnia (34 [12·1%; 8·6–16·3] of 280), anxiety (21 [12·3%; 7·7–17·7] of 171), irritability (28 [12·8%; 8·7–17·6] of 218), memory impairment (44 [18·9%; 14·1–24·2] of 233), fatigue (61 [19·3%; 15·1–23·9] of 316), and in one study traumatic memories (55 [30·4%; 23·9–37·3] of 181) and sleep disorder (14 [100·0%; 88·0–100·0] of 14) were frequently reported. The meta-analysis indicated that in the post-illness stage the point prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder was 32·2% (95% CI 23·7–42·0; 121 of 402 cases from four studies), that of depression was 14·9% (12·1–18·2; 77 of 517 cases from five studies), and that of anxiety disorders was 14·8% (11·1–19·4; 42 of 284 cases from three studies). 446 (76·9%; 95% CI 68·1–84·6) of 580 patients from six studies had returned to work at a mean follow-up time of 35·3 months (SD 40·1). When data for patients with COVID-19 were examined (including preprint data), there was evidence for delirium (confusion in 26 [65%] of 40 intensive care unit patients and agitation in 40 [69%] of 58 intensive care unit patients in one study, and altered consciousness in 17 [21%] of 82 patients who subsequently died in another study). At discharge, 15 (33%) of 45 patients with COVID-19 who were assessed had a dysexecutive syndrome in one study. At the time of writing, there were two reports of hypoxic encephalopathy and one report of encephalitis. 68 (94%) of the 72 studies were of either low or medium quality.Interpretation
If infection with SARS-CoV-2 follows a similar course to that with SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV, most patients should recover without experiencing mental illness. SARS-CoV-2 might cause delirium in a significant proportion of patients in the acute stage. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of depression, anxiety, fatigue, post-traumatic stress disorder, and rarer neuropsychiatric syndromes in the longer term.Funding
Wellcome Trust, UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK Medical Research Council, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University College London.Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
48 publications, 2.65%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
38 publications, 2.1%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
21 publications, 1.16%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
21 publications, 1.16%
|
|
|
Cureus
21 publications, 1.16%
|
|
|
Psychiatry Research
20 publications, 1.1%
|
|
|
Journal of Affective Disorders
20 publications, 1.1%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
19 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
The Lancet Psychiatry
19 publications, 1.05%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
17 publications, 0.94%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
17 publications, 0.94%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Neurology
16 publications, 0.88%
|
|
|
Brain Sciences
15 publications, 0.83%
|
|
|
Journal of Psychiatric Research
14 publications, 0.77%
|
|
|
Healthcare
13 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
BMC Psychiatry
13 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
BMJ Open
13 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
12 publications, 0.66%
|
|
|
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
12 publications, 0.66%
|
|
|
Translational Psychiatry
11 publications, 0.61%
|
|
|
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 publications, 0.61%
|
|
|
Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova
11 publications, 0.61%
|
|
|
General Hospital Psychiatry
10 publications, 0.55%
|
|
|
Journal of Medical Virology
10 publications, 0.55%
|
|
|
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
9 publications, 0.5%
|
|
|
Sleep Medicine
9 publications, 0.5%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
8 publications, 0.44%
|
|
|
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine
8 publications, 0.44%
|
|
|
Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry
8 publications, 0.44%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
Publishers
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
|
Elsevier
340 publications, 18.78%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
314 publications, 17.35%
|
|
|
MDPI
174 publications, 9.61%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
133 publications, 7.35%
|
|
|
Wiley
80 publications, 4.42%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
80 publications, 4.42%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
67 publications, 3.7%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
53 publications, 2.93%
|
|
|
SAGE
51 publications, 2.82%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
34 publications, 1.88%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
32 publications, 1.77%
|
|
|
BMJ
26 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
23 publications, 1.27%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
17 publications, 0.94%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
17 publications, 0.94%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
12 publications, 0.66%
|
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
12 publications, 0.66%
|
|
|
IntechOpen
11 publications, 0.61%
|
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
10 publications, 0.55%
|
|
|
Medknow
9 publications, 0.5%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
8 publications, 0.44%
|
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
8 publications, 0.44%
|
|
|
IMA Press, LLC
8 publications, 0.44%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
7 publications, 0.39%
|
|
|
Emerald
7 publications, 0.39%
|
|
|
Spandidos Publications
7 publications, 0.39%
|
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
7 publications, 0.39%
|
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
6 publications, 0.33%
|
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1.8k
Total citations:
1810
Citations from 2024:
261
(14.42%)
The most citing journal
Citations in journal:
48
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Rogers J. W. et al. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic // The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. Vol. 7. No. 7. pp. 611-627.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Rogers J. W., Chesney E., Oliver D., Pollak T. A., McGuire P., Fusar-Poli P., Zandi M. S., Lewis G., David A. S. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic // The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. Vol. 7. No. 7. pp. 611-627.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0
TI - Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - The Lancet Psychiatry
AU - Rogers, Jonathan W.
AU - Chesney, Edward
AU - Oliver, Dominic
AU - Pollak, T. A.
AU - McGuire, Philip
AU - Fusar-Poli, Paolo
AU - Zandi, M. S.
AU - Lewis, Glyn
AU - David, Anthony S.
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/07/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 611-627
IS - 7
VL - 7
PMID - 32437679
SN - 2215-0366
SN - 2215-0374
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2020_Rogers,
author = {Jonathan W. Rogers and Edward Chesney and Dominic Oliver and T. A. Pollak and Philip McGuire and Paolo Fusar-Poli and M. S. Zandi and Glyn Lewis and Anthony S. David},
title = {Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic},
journal = {The Lancet Psychiatry},
year = {2020},
volume = {7},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0},
number = {7},
pages = {611--627},
doi = {10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Rogers, Jonathan W., et al. “Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic.” The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 7, no. 7, Jul. 2020, pp. 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0.