volume 38 issue 3 pages 229-233

Analysis of the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries

Flávia Cristina Morone Pinto 1
Rafael Navarenho de Souza 1
Cely B. Silva 2
Lycia Mara Jenné Mimica 2
Kazuko Uchikawa Graziano 1
2
 
Department of Hospital Infection Control of Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2010-04-01
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.911
CiteScore7.9
Impact factor2.4
ISSN01966553, 15273296
Infectious Diseases
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Health Policy
Epidemiology
Abstract
Because of advances in technology, the number of orthopedic surgeries, mainly hip and knee replacement surgeries, has increased, with a total of 150,000 prosthetic surgeries estimated per year in the United States and 400,000 worldwide.We used an exploratory cross-sectional study, with a quantitative approach to determine the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries, quantifying and identifying the microbial growth genus and species, according to the surgical potential of contamination that characterizes the challenge faced by the Material and Sterilization Center at the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Hospital das Clinicas of the School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.The orthopedic surgical instruments were immersed, after their use, in sterilized distilled water, sonicated in an ultrasonic washer, and posteriorly agitated. Subsequently, the wash was filtrated through a 0.45-mum membrane and incubated in aerobic and anaerobic mediums and in medium for fungi and yeasts.In clean surgeries, 47% of the instruments were contaminated; in contaminated surgeries, 70%; and, in infected surgeries, 80%. Regardless of the contamination potential of the surgeries, the highest quantitative incidence of microorganism recovery was located in the 1 to 100 colony-forming unit range, and 13 samples presented a microbial growth potential >300 colony-forming units. Regardless of the contamination potential of the surgeries, there was a convergence in the incidence of negative-coagulase Staphylococcus growth (28%, clean surgeries; 32%, contaminated surgeries; and 29%, infected surgeries) and Staphylococcus aureus (28%, contaminated surgeries; and 43%, infected surgeries).Most of the microorganisms recovered from the analyzed instruments (78%) were vegetative bacteria that presented their death curve at around 80 degrees C, characterizing a low challenge considering the processes of cleaning and sterilization currently employed by the Material and Sterilization Center. Fewer microorganisms were recovered from instruments used in clean surgeries in comparison with those used in contaminated and infected surgeries.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
American Journal of Infection Control
6 publications, 20.69%
Journal of Hospital Infection
3 publications, 10.34%
Journal of Arthroplasty
2 publications, 6.9%
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
1 publication, 3.45%
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
1 publication, 3.45%
Infection Prevention in Practice
1 publication, 3.45%
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1 publication, 3.45%
Cirugia Espanola
1 publication, 3.45%
Biotribology
1 publication, 3.45%
Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
1 publication, 3.45%
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
1 publication, 3.45%
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
1 publication, 3.45%
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
1 publication, 3.45%
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
1 publication, 3.45%
Journal not defined
1 publication, 3.45%
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
1 publication, 3.45%
Chemical Engineering Journal
1 publication, 3.45%
Arthroplasty
1 publication, 3.45%
Diagnostics
1 publication, 3.45%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Elsevier
16 publications, 55.17%
Springer Nature
3 publications, 10.34%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 3.45%
Wiley
1 publication, 3.45%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 3.45%
SciELO
1 publication, 3.45%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 3.45%
Korean Orthopaedic Association
1 publication, 3.45%
1 publication, 3.45%
MDPI
1 publication, 3.45%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
29
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Pinto F. C. M. et al. Analysis of the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries // American Journal of Infection Control. 2010. Vol. 38. No. 3. pp. 229-233.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Pinto F. C. M., Navarenho de Souza R., Silva C. B., Jenné Mimica L. M., Graziano K. U. Analysis of the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries // American Journal of Infection Control. 2010. Vol. 38. No. 3. pp. 229-233.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.017
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.017
TI - Analysis of the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries
T2 - American Journal of Infection Control
AU - Pinto, Flávia Cristina Morone
AU - Navarenho de Souza, Rafael
AU - Silva, Cely B.
AU - Jenné Mimica, Lycia Mara
AU - Graziano, Kazuko Uchikawa
PY - 2010
DA - 2010/04/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 229-233
IS - 3
VL - 38
PMID - 19913328
SN - 0196-6553
SN - 1527-3296
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2010_Pinto,
author = {Flávia Cristina Morone Pinto and Rafael Navarenho de Souza and Cely B. Silva and Lycia Mara Jenné Mimica and Kazuko Uchikawa Graziano},
title = {Analysis of the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries},
journal = {American Journal of Infection Control},
year = {2010},
volume = {38},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.017},
number = {3},
pages = {229--233},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.017}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Pinto, Flávia Cristina Morone, et al. “Analysis of the microbial load in instruments used in orthopedic surgeries.” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 38, no. 3, Apr. 2010, pp. 229-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.017.