том 99 страницы 103610

PPE fit of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Janson D.J., Clift B.C., Dhokia V.
Тип публикацииJournal Article
Дата публикации2022-02-01
SCImago Q1
Tоп 10% SCImago
WOS Q2
БС1
SJR1.018
CiteScore8.7
Impact factor3.5
ISSN00036870, 18729126
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Engineering (miscellaneous)
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Human Factors and Ergonomics
Краткое описание
Historically, PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) has generally been designed around the size and shape of an average European or US white man's face and body. There is little academic evidence to support anecdotal reports that women are at a greater disadvantage than men from ill-fitting PPE. This is especially relevant in healthcare settings where women make up at least 75% of frontline workers. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated problems associated with the fit of PPE that until now have been mainly anecdotal. This research presents results and analysis of a quantitative and qualitative survey concerning the fit of PPE worn by 248 healthcare workers, in a variety of healthcare roles and settings, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis of the survey results showed that women were less likely than men to feel safe carrying out their roles, with only 30.5% of women and 53.3% of men stating that they felt safe all of the time. A statistically significant link is made between women suffering more with poor fit than men with certain categories of PPE (gowns, masks, visors, goggles). Over four times as many women (54.8%) as men (13.3%) reported their surgical gowns being large to some degree and women were nearly twice as likely (53.5%) to experience oversized surgical masks than men (28.6%). However, it was recognized that PPE fit problems are not exclusive to women as many men also do not conform to the underlying shape and size of PPE designs. Survey results indicated that both sexes felt equally hampered due to the fit of their PPE and around a third of both women and men had modified their PPE to address fit issues. Oversized and modified PPE presents its own set of unintended consequences. Following strict processes for doffing and removing PPE is key to virus control but doffing modified PPE can fall outside of these processes, risking cross infection. In addition, wearers of critical items of PPE (such as respirators) currently undergo a "fit test"; however, fit does not reconcile with comfort and over-tightened PPE can cause headaches, discomfort and distraction when worn for long periods. Requirements and fit tests are also not setting-specific; qualitative responses from the survey give an indication that this must be a future consideration.
Для доступа к списку цитирований публикации необходимо авторизоваться.

Топ-30

Журналы

1
2
3
Applied Ergonomics
3 публикации, 10.34%
PLoS ONE
3 публикации, 10.34%
EClinicalMedicine
1 публикация, 3.45%
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
1 публикация, 3.45%
Safety
1 публикация, 3.45%
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
1 публикация, 3.45%
Bioengineering
1 публикация, 3.45%
Gaceta Sanitaria
1 публикация, 3.45%
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
1 публикация, 3.45%
Energy and Built Environment
1 публикация, 3.45%
Journal of Clinical Medicine
1 публикация, 3.45%
Design Studies
1 публикация, 3.45%
Biomaterials
1 публикация, 3.45%
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
1 публикация, 3.45%
Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration
1 публикация, 3.45%
Medical Journal of Babylon
1 публикация, 3.45%
Cognition, Technology and Work
1 публикация, 3.45%
Annals of Work Exposures and Health
1 публикация, 3.45%
medRxiv
1 публикация, 3.45%
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
1 публикация, 3.45%
Scientific Reports
1 публикация, 3.45%
Work
1 публикация, 3.45%
Safety Science
1 публикация, 3.45%
1
2
3

Издатели

2
4
6
8
10
Elsevier
10 публикаций, 34.48%
Springer Nature
4 публикации, 13.79%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 публикации, 10.34%
MDPI
3 публикации, 10.34%
Wiley
1 публикация, 3.45%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 публикация, 3.45%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 публикация, 3.45%
Taylor & Francis
1 публикация, 3.45%
Oxford University Press
1 публикация, 3.45%
openRxiv
1 публикация, 3.45%
SAGE
1 публикация, 3.45%
IOS Press
1 публикация, 3.45%
2
4
6
8
10
  • Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
  • Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.

Вы ученый?

Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
 Войти с ORCID
Метрики
29
Поделиться
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
Цитировать
Janson D. J., Clift B. C., Dhokia V. PPE fit of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic // Applied Ergonomics. 2022. Vol. 99. p. 103610.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50) Скопировать
Janson D. J., Clift B. C., Dhokia V. PPE fit of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic // Applied Ergonomics. 2022. Vol. 99. p. 103610.
RIS |
Цитировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103610
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103610
TI - PPE fit of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - Applied Ergonomics
AU - Janson, D J
AU - Clift, B C
AU - Dhokia, V
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/02/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 103610
VL - 99
PMID - 34740070
SN - 0003-6870
SN - 1872-9126
ER -
BibTex
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов) Скопировать
@article{2022_Janson,
author = {D J Janson and B C Clift and V Dhokia},
title = {PPE fit of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic},
journal = {Applied Ergonomics},
year = {2022},
volume = {99},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103610},
pages = {103610},
doi = {10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103610}
}
Ошибка в публикации?