Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values
1
Norwegian Computing Center, P.O.Box 114 Blindern, N-0314 Oslo, Norway
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2021-09-01
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR: 1.836
CiteScore: 15.0
Impact factor: 4.6
ISSN: 00043702, 26331403, 27101673, 27101681
Artificial Intelligence
Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
Abstract
Explaining complex or seemingly simple machine learning models is an important practical problem. We want to explain individual predictions from such models by learning simple, interpretable explanations. Shapley value is a game theoretic concept that can be used for this purpose. The Shapley value framework has a series of desirable theoretical properties, and can in principle handle any predictive model. Kernel SHAP is a computationally efficient approximation to Shapley values in higher dimensions. Like several other existing methods, this approach assumes that the features are independent. Since Shapley values currently suffer from inclusion of unrealistic data instances when features are correlated, the explanations may be very misleading. This is the case even if a simple linear model is used for predictions. In this paper, we extend the Kernel SHAP method to handle dependent features. We provide several examples of linear and non-linear models with various degrees of feature dependence, where our method gives more accurate approximations to the true Shapley values.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
13 publications, 2.42%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
11 publications, 2.04%
|
|
|
IEEE Access
9 publications, 1.67%
|
|
|
Remote Sensing
8 publications, 1.49%
|
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
8 publications, 1.49%
|
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
6 publications, 1.12%
|
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
6 publications, 1.12%
|
|
|
Artificial Intelligence
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
|
Fuel
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
|
Journal of Hydrology
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
|
Sensors
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Minds and Machines
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Nature Communications
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
International Journal of Medical Informatics
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Neural Networks
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Ecological Informatics
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Machine Learning
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Information Fusion
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Water Research
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishers
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
|
Elsevier
184 publications, 34.2%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
117 publications, 21.75%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
43 publications, 7.99%
|
|
|
MDPI
40 publications, 7.43%
|
|
|
Wiley
26 publications, 4.83%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
14 publications, 2.6%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
13 publications, 2.42%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
12 publications, 2.23%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
10 publications, 1.86%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
9 publications, 1.67%
|
|
|
Copernicus
7 publications, 1.3%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
|
SAGE
5 publications, 0.93%
|
|
|
American Geophysical Union
4 publications, 0.74%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
3 publications, 0.56%
|
|
|
Emerald
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 0.37%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
|
AME Publishing Company
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
|
Behaviormetric Society of Japan
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 0.19%
|
|
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
546
Total citations:
546
Citations from 2024:
368
(68.4%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Aas K., Jullum M., Løland A. Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values // Artificial Intelligence. 2021. Vol. 298. p. 103502.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Aas K., Jullum M., Løland A. Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values // Artificial Intelligence. 2021. Vol. 298. p. 103502.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103502
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103502
TI - Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values
T2 - Artificial Intelligence
AU - Aas, Kjersti
AU - Jullum, Martin
AU - Løland, Anders
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/09/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 103502
VL - 298
SN - 0004-3702
SN - 2633-1403
SN - 2710-1673
SN - 2710-1681
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2021_Aas,
author = {Kjersti Aas and Martin Jullum and Anders Løland},
title = {Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values},
journal = {Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2021},
volume = {298},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103502},
pages = {103502},
doi = {10.1016/j.artint.2021.103502}
}