Open Access
Open access
volume 202 pages 105705

Evaluation of persistent versus commercial nematode strains for management of Curculio caryae (Horn) and other weevils in pecan

Eddie K Slusher 1, 2
Elson Shields 3, 4
Will Harges 5
Jermaine D Perier 6
David Shapiro-Ilan 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-03-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.856
CiteScore7.9
Impact factor3.4
ISSN10499644, 10902112
Abstract
Pecan weevil is a key pest of pecans. In addition, weevils such as Fuller rose beetle (FRB) and two-banded Japanese weevil (TJW) feed on pecan foliage and roots. Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) have previously been shown to be effective tools for pecan weevil management. However, EPNs need frequent reapplication. Thus, there is a need to develop persistent strains of EPNs that can be applied less frequently and at lower rates. In this study, we compared two persistent strains of EPNs, NY01′ (Steinernema carpocapsae Weiser) and NY04′ (Steinernema feltiae Filipjev), against two commercial EPN strains, ScAll (S. carpocapsae) and SfSn (S. feltiae), in the lab and field. For the field study, the suppressive ability of each pair of EPNs on pecan weevil, FRB, and TJW was compared alongside a water only control. EPNs were only applied in the first year of the study (2022) and insect populations were monitored in 2022 and 2023. For the field study in Georgia, significantly fewer TJW were caught in trees treated with either nematode type in both study years. For the field study in Oklahoma, significantly fewer pecan weevils were caught in trees treated with commercial nematodes compared to the persistent nematodes and control in both study years. In lab trials, there was a lack of consistency in survival of the four strains. The results of this study indicate that commercial nematodes can have substantial carryover across two field seasons and can be applied at a significantly lower rate and still provide pest suppression.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Agricultural and Forest Entomology
1 publication, 100%
1

Publishers

1
Wiley
1 publication, 100%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Slusher E. K. et al. Evaluation of persistent versus commercial nematode strains for management of Curculio caryae (Horn) and other weevils in pecan // Biological Control. 2025. Vol. 202. p. 105705.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Slusher E. K., Shields E., Harges W., Perier J. D., Shapiro-Ilan D. Evaluation of persistent versus commercial nematode strains for management of Curculio caryae (Horn) and other weevils in pecan // Biological Control. 2025. Vol. 202. p. 105705.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105705
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1049964425000155
TI - Evaluation of persistent versus commercial nematode strains for management of Curculio caryae (Horn) and other weevils in pecan
T2 - Biological Control
AU - Slusher, Eddie K
AU - Shields, Elson
AU - Harges, Will
AU - Perier, Jermaine D
AU - Shapiro-Ilan, David
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/03/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 105705
VL - 202
SN - 1049-9644
SN - 1090-2112
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Slusher,
author = {Eddie K Slusher and Elson Shields and Will Harges and Jermaine D Perier and David Shapiro-Ilan},
title = {Evaluation of persistent versus commercial nematode strains for management of Curculio caryae (Horn) and other weevils in pecan},
journal = {Biological Control},
year = {2025},
volume = {202},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {mar},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1049964425000155},
pages = {105705},
doi = {10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105705}
}