volume 1856 pages 149571

In silico screening to search for selective sodium channel blockers: When size matters

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-06-01
scimago Q2
wos Q3
SJR0.851
CiteScore4.8
Impact factor2.6
ISSN00068993, 18726240
Abstract
Dravet Syndrome is a severe childhood drug-resistant epilepsy. The predominant etiology of this condition is related to de novo mutations within the SCN1A gene, which codes for the alpha subunit of the NaV1.1 sodium channels. This dysfunction leads to hypoexcitability of GABAergic interneurons. In turn, the loss of electrical excitability in GABAergic interneurons leads to an imbalance of excitation over inhibition in many neural circuits.Notably, exacerbation of symptoms is observed when non-selective sodium channel blockers are administered to patients with Dravet. Recent studies in animal models of Dravet have highlighted the potential of highly specific sodium channel blockers capable of blocking other sodium channel subtypes without inhibiting NaV1.1 current and selective activators of NaV1.1 as viable therapeutic strategies for alleviating Dravet Syndrome symptoms.Here, we describe the development and validation of ligand-based machine learning models to identify ligands with inhibitory effects on sodium channel isoforms NaV1.1 and NaV1.2. These models were built based on in-house open-source routines and Mordred molecular descriptors. First, linear classifiers were inferred using a combination of feature-bagging and Forward Stepwise selection. Secondly, ensemble learning was applied to build meta-classifiers with improved predictive ability, whose performance was tested in retrospective screening experiments. After in silico validation, the models were applied to screen for drug repurposing opportunities in the DrugBank and Drug Repurposing Hub databases, to identify selective blocking agents of NaV1.2 devoid of NaV1.1 blocking activity, as potential compounds for the treatment of Dravet Syndrome.Forty in silico hits were later identified in a prospective screening experiment. Four of them were acquired and submitted to experimental confirmation via patch clamp: three of these candidates, Eltrombopag, Sufugolix, and Glesatinib, showed blocking effects on NaV1.2 currents, although no subtype selectivity was observed. The different predictive abilities of the NaV1.1 and NaV1.2 models may be attributed to the different sizes of the datasets used to train and validate the respective models.
Found 
Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
1
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Fallico M. et al. In silico screening to search for selective sodium channel blockers: When size matters // Brain Research. 2025. Vol. 1856. p. 149571.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Fallico M., Alberca L. N., Enrique N., Orsi F., Prada Gori D. N., Martín P., Gavernet L., Talevi A. In silico screening to search for selective sodium channel blockers: When size matters // Brain Research. 2025. Vol. 1856. p. 149571.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149571
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006899325001295
TI - In silico screening to search for selective sodium channel blockers: When size matters
T2 - Brain Research
AU - Fallico, Maximiliano
AU - Alberca, Lucas Nicolás
AU - Enrique, Nicolas
AU - Orsi, Federico
AU - Prada Gori, Denis Nihuel
AU - Martín, Pedro
AU - Gavernet, L.
AU - Talevi, Alan
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/06/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 149571
VL - 1856
SN - 0006-8993
SN - 1872-6240
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Fallico,
author = {Maximiliano Fallico and Lucas Nicolás Alberca and Nicolas Enrique and Federico Orsi and Denis Nihuel Prada Gori and Pedro Martín and L. Gavernet and Alan Talevi},
title = {In silico screening to search for selective sodium channel blockers: When size matters},
journal = {Brain Research},
year = {2025},
volume = {1856},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jun},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006899325001295},
pages = {149571},
doi = {10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149571}
}