Comparison of 4 commercial kits for the extraction of circulating DNA from plasma
1
2
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, New South Wales, Australia.
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2018-12-01
scimago Q3
wos Q3
SJR: 0.709
CiteScore: 3.5
Impact factor: 2.1
ISSN: 22107762, 22107770
PubMed ID:
29567030
Cancer Research
Molecular Biology
Genetics
Abstract
The utility of circulating DNA as a source of clinical biomarkers in blood is limited by its low concentration and small fragment size. Effective purification methods can maximize circulating DNA yield and contribute to the success of downstream protocols. We describe the evaluation of 4 commercial DNA purification kits-QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acids kit, QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit, QIAamp Ultrasens Virus kit and the QIASymphony DSP Virus kit-for the extraction of high and low molecular weight DNA from blood plasma. Using qPCR to quantitate endogenous Alu sequences, as well as spiked exogenous high and low molecular weight zebrafish DNA, we found that the Circulating Nucleic Acids kit and the DSP kit were both efficient at purifying DNA from plasma regardless of fragment size, whereas the DNA Blood Mini kit was only able to effectively extract high molecular weight DNA. The Ultrasens Virus Kit produced the lowest yields for both large and small fragments. The use of carrier RNA with the Circulating Nucleic Acids and the DSP kits improved yields. Appropriate choice of kit can be an important factor in determining experiment outcome.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
|
|
|
Cancers
4 publications, 7.02%
|
|
|
Clinical Chemistry
4 publications, 7.02%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Advances in Clinical Chemistry
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
The Analyst
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Langmuir
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Tumor Biology
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Current Opinion in Oncology
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
BioTechniques
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Diagnostics
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Molecular Cancer
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Analytica Chimica Acta
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Applied Surface Science
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Acta Tropica
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Animals
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Gynecologic Oncology
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Cancer genetics
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
Publishers
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
|
Elsevier
14 publications, 24.56%
|
|
|
MDPI
11 publications, 19.3%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
8 publications, 14.04%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 7.02%
|
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
3 publications, 5.26%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 5.26%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Wiley
2 publications, 3.51%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
AME Publishing Company
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 1.75%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
57
Total citations:
57
Citations from 2024:
10
(17%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Warton K. et al. Comparison of 4 commercial kits for the extraction of circulating DNA from plasma // Cancer genetics. 2018. Vol. 228-229. pp. 143-150.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Warton K., Graham L. J., Yuwono N. L., Samimi G. Comparison of 4 commercial kits for the extraction of circulating DNA from plasma // Cancer genetics. 2018. Vol. 228-229. pp. 143-150.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.02.004
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.02.004
TI - Comparison of 4 commercial kits for the extraction of circulating DNA from plasma
T2 - Cancer genetics
AU - Warton, Kristina
AU - Graham, Lisa Jane
AU - Yuwono, N L
AU - Samimi, Goli
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/12/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 143-150
VL - 228-229
PMID - 29567030
SN - 2210-7762
SN - 2210-7770
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2018_Warton,
author = {Kristina Warton and Lisa Jane Graham and N L Yuwono and Goli Samimi},
title = {Comparison of 4 commercial kits for the extraction of circulating DNA from plasma},
journal = {Cancer genetics},
year = {2018},
volume = {228-229},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.02.004},
pages = {143--150},
doi = {10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.02.004}
}