volume 185 issue 12 pages 2103-2115.e19

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike

Daichi Yamasoba 1, 2
Izumi Kimura 1
Hesham Nasser 3, 4
Yuhei Morioka 5
Naganori Nao 6, 7
Jumpei Ito 1
Keiya Uriu 1
Masumi Tsuda 8
Jiří Zahradník 9
Kotaro Shirakawa 10
Rigel Suzuki 5
Mai Kishimoto 11
Yusuke Kosugi 1, 12, 13
Kouji Kobiyama 14
Teppei Hara 14
Mako Toyoda 15
Yuri L Tanaka 16
Erika P Butlertanaka 16
Ryo Shimizu 4
Hayato Ito 5
Lei Wang 8
Yoshitaka Oda 8
HIROFUMI SAWA 11, 16
Michihito Sasaki 11
Kayoko Nagata 10
Kumiko Yoshimatsu 17
Hiroyuki Asakura 18
Mami Nagashima 18
Kenji Sadamasu 18
Kazuhisa Yoshimura 18
Jin Kuramochi 19
Motoaki Seki 20
Ryoji Fujiki 20
Tadanaga Shimada 21
Taka-aki Nakada 21
Seiichiro Sakao 22
Takuji Suzuki 22
Takamasa Ueno 15
Akifumi Takaori-Kondo 10
Ken Ishii 14
Gideon Schreiber 9
Hirofumi Sawa 6, 7
Akatsuki Saito 16
Takashi Irie 23
Keita Matsuno 7
Terumasa Ikeda 4
Kei Sato 1, 24, 25
19
 
Interpark Kuramochi Clinic, Utsunomiya, Japan
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-06-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR22.612
CiteScore74.8
Impact factor42.5
ISSN00928674, 10974172
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Abstract

Summary

Soon after the emergence and global spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineage BA.1, another Omicron lineage, BA.2, began outcompeting BA.1. The results of statistical analysis showed that the effective reproduction number of BA.2 is 1.4-fold higher than that of BA.1. Neutralization experiments revealed that immunity induced by COVID vaccines widely administered to human populations is not effective against BA.2, similar to BA.1, and that the antigenicity of BA.2 is notably different from that of BA.1. Cell culture experiments showed that the BA.2 spike confers higher replication efficacy in human nasal epithelial cells and is more efficient in mediating syncytia formation than the BA.1 spike. Furthermore, infection experiments using hamsters indicated that the BA.2 spike-bearing virus is more pathogenic than the BA.1 spike-bearing virus. Altogether, the results of our multiscale investigations suggest that the risk of BA.2 to global health is potentially higher than that of BA.1.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
Nature Communications
12 publications, 4%
Viruses
12 publications, 4%
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
9 publications, 3%
Journal of Medical Virology
8 publications, 2.67%
Cell Host and Microbe
7 publications, 2.33%
iScience
7 publications, 2.33%
Journal of Virology
6 publications, 2%
Emerging Microbes & Infections
6 publications, 2%
Frontiers in Immunology
5 publications, 1.67%
Frontiers in Medicine
5 publications, 1.67%
PLoS Pathogens
5 publications, 1.67%
EBioMedicine
5 publications, 1.67%
Microbiology spectrum
4 publications, 1.33%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
4 publications, 1.33%
Vaccines
4 publications, 1.33%
Antiviral Research
4 publications, 1.33%
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
4 publications, 1.33%
Scientific Reports
4 publications, 1.33%
bioRxiv
4 publications, 1.33%
mBio
4 publications, 1.33%
Frontiers in Microbiology
3 publications, 1%
Frontiers in Virology
3 publications, 1%
Virology Journal
3 publications, 1%
Communications Medicine
2 publications, 0.67%
Nature
2 publications, 0.67%
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
2 publications, 0.67%
Communications Biology
2 publications, 0.67%
Journal of Biomedical Science
2 publications, 0.67%
Cell Discovery
2 publications, 0.67%
2
4
6
8
10
12

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Elsevier
65 publications, 21.67%
Springer Nature
45 publications, 15%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
42 publications, 14%
MDPI
30 publications, 10%
Frontiers Media S.A.
19 publications, 6.33%
Wiley
17 publications, 5.67%
American Society for Microbiology
15 publications, 5%
Taylor & Francis
8 publications, 2.67%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
5 publications, 1.67%
Oxford University Press
5 publications, 1.67%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 publications, 1.33%
Research Square Platform LLC
4 publications, 1.33%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
3 publications, 1%
Walter de Gruyter
2 publications, 0.67%
F1000 Research
2 publications, 0.67%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
2 publications, 0.67%
IntechOpen
2 publications, 0.67%
Massachusetts Medical Society
1 publication, 0.33%
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1 publication, 0.33%
American Society for Clinical Investigation
1 publication, 0.33%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 0.33%
European Molecular Biology Organization
1 publication, 0.33%
Eco-Vector LLC
1 publication, 0.33%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.33%
Microbiology Society
1 publication, 0.33%
The Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis
1 publication, 0.33%
SAGE
1 publication, 0.33%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 0.33%
SciELO
1 publication, 0.33%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
301
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Yamasoba D. et al. Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike // Cell. 2022. Vol. 185. No. 12. p. 2103-2115.e19.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Yamasoba D. et al. Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike // Cell. 2022. Vol. 185. No. 12. p. 2103-2115.e19.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.035
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.035
TI - Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike
T2 - Cell
AU - Yamasoba, Daichi
AU - Kimura, Izumi
AU - Nasser, Hesham
AU - Morioka, Yuhei
AU - Nao, Naganori
AU - Ito, Jumpei
AU - Uriu, Keiya
AU - Tsuda, Masumi
AU - Zahradník, Jiří
AU - Shirakawa, Kotaro
AU - Suzuki, Rigel
AU - Kishimoto, Mai
AU - Kosugi, Yusuke
AU - Kobiyama, Kouji
AU - Hara, Teppei
AU - Toyoda, Mako
AU - Tanaka, Yuri L
AU - Butlertanaka, Erika P
AU - Shimizu, Ryo
AU - Ito, Hayato
AU - Wang, Lei
AU - Oda, Yoshitaka
AU - SAWA, HIROFUMI
AU - Sasaki, Michihito
AU - Nagata, Kayoko
AU - Yoshimatsu, Kumiko
AU - Asakura, Hiroyuki
AU - Nagashima, Mami
AU - Sadamasu, Kenji
AU - Yoshimura, Kazuhisa
AU - Kuramochi, Jin
AU - Seki, Motoaki
AU - Fujiki, Ryoji
AU - Kaneda, Atsushi
AU - Shimada, Tadanaga
AU - Nakada, Taka-aki
AU - Sakao, Seiichiro
AU - Suzuki, Takuji
AU - Ueno, Takamasa
AU - Takaori-Kondo, Akifumi
AU - Ishii, Ken
AU - Schreiber, Gideon
AU - Sawa, Hirofumi
AU - Saito, Akatsuki
AU - Irie, Takashi
AU - Tanaka, Shinya
AU - Matsuno, Keita
AU - Fukuhara, Takasuke
AU - Ikeda, Terumasa
AU - Sato, Kei
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/06/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 2103-2115.e19
IS - 12
VL - 185
PMID - 35568035
SN - 0092-8674
SN - 1097-4172
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Yamasoba,
author = {Daichi Yamasoba and Izumi Kimura and Hesham Nasser and Yuhei Morioka and Naganori Nao and Jumpei Ito and Keiya Uriu and Masumi Tsuda and Jiří Zahradník and Kotaro Shirakawa and Rigel Suzuki and Mai Kishimoto and Yusuke Kosugi and Kouji Kobiyama and Teppei Hara and Mako Toyoda and Yuri L Tanaka and Erika P Butlertanaka and Ryo Shimizu and Hayato Ito and Lei Wang and Yoshitaka Oda and HIROFUMI SAWA and Michihito Sasaki and Kayoko Nagata and Kumiko Yoshimatsu and Hiroyuki Asakura and Mami Nagashima and Kenji Sadamasu and Kazuhisa Yoshimura and Jin Kuramochi and Motoaki Seki and Ryoji Fujiki and Atsushi Kaneda and Tadanaga Shimada and Taka-aki Nakada and Seiichiro Sakao and Takuji Suzuki and Takamasa Ueno and Akifumi Takaori-Kondo and Ken Ishii and Gideon Schreiber and Hirofumi Sawa and Akatsuki Saito and Takashi Irie and Shinya Tanaka and Keita Matsuno and Takasuke Fukuhara and Terumasa Ikeda and Kei Sato and others},
title = {Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike},
journal = {Cell},
year = {2022},
volume = {185},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.035},
number = {12},
pages = {2103--2115.e19},
doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.035}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Yamasoba, Daichi, et al. “Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike.” Cell, vol. 185, no. 12, Jun. 2022, pp. 2103-2115.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.035.