volume 72 pages 115-122

Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2017-07-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.923
CiteScore20.7
Impact factor8.9
ISSN07475632, 18737692
Human-Computer Interaction
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
General Psychology
Abstract
Applying uses and gratifications theory (UGT) and social capital theory, our study examined users of four social networking sites (SNSs) (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat), and their influence on online bridging and bonding social capital. Results (N=297) found that Twitter users had the highest bridging social capital, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Snapchat, while Snapchat users had the highest bonding social capital, followed by Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. SNS intensity, trust, tie strength, homophily, privacy concerns, introversion, and attention to social comparison were also found to moderate the relationship between SNS use and online bridging and bonding social capital. Uses and gratification theory (UGT) was applied to explain social networking site usage.Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat influence bridging/bonding social capital.SNS intensity, tie strength, privacy, introversion, and social comparison are moderators.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Computers in Human Behavior
19 publications, 4.69%
Telematics and Informatics
12 publications, 2.96%
Frontiers in Psychology
10 publications, 2.47%
Sustainability
9 publications, 2.22%
Current Psychology
7 publications, 1.73%
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
7 publications, 1.73%
SAGE Open
6 publications, 1.48%
Information Technology and People
5 publications, 1.23%
Journal of Medical Internet Research
5 publications, 1.23%
Social Media and Society
5 publications, 1.23%
Journal of Business Research
5 publications, 1.23%
Behaviour and Information Technology
5 publications, 1.23%
Internet Research
4 publications, 0.99%
Emerging Adulthood
4 publications, 0.99%
Social Science Computer Review
4 publications, 0.99%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
4 publications, 0.99%
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
4 publications, 0.99%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
4 publications, 0.99%
Scientific Reports
3 publications, 0.74%
Heliyon
3 publications, 0.74%
PLoS ONE
3 publications, 0.74%
Technology in Society
3 publications, 0.74%
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
3 publications, 0.74%
Cogent Social Sciences
3 publications, 0.74%
IEEE Access
3 publications, 0.74%
Contemporary Approaches to Activity Theory
3 publications, 0.74%
Cyberpsychology
3 publications, 0.74%
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
2 publications, 0.49%
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
2 publications, 0.49%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Elsevier
83 publications, 20.49%
Taylor & Francis
63 publications, 15.56%
Springer Nature
49 publications, 12.1%
SAGE
40 publications, 9.88%
Emerald
33 publications, 8.15%
MDPI
23 publications, 5.68%
Wiley
17 publications, 4.2%
IGI Global
14 publications, 3.46%
Frontiers Media S.A.
14 publications, 3.46%
JMIR Publications
12 publications, 2.96%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
11 publications, 2.72%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
5 publications, 1.23%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
4 publications, 0.99%
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 0.74%
Masaryk University Press
3 publications, 0.74%
American Psychological Association (APA)
3 publications, 0.74%
Social Science Electronic Publishing
2 publications, 0.49%
Walter de Gruyter
2 publications, 0.49%
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 0.49%
John Benjamins Publishing Company
2 publications, 0.49%
University of Chicago Press
1 publication, 0.25%
Human Kinetics
1 publication, 0.25%
European Academy of Management and Business Economics
1 publication, 0.25%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.25%
University of Warsaw
1 publication, 0.25%
Medknow
1 publication, 0.25%
Consortium Erudit
1 publication, 0.25%
Cogitatio
1 publication, 0.25%
Hans Publishers
1 publication, 0.25%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
405
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Phua J., Jin S. V., Kim J. (. Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat // Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. Vol. 72. pp. 115-122.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Phua J., Jin S. V., Kim J. (. Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat // Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. Vol. 72. pp. 115-122.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041
TI - Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat
T2 - Computers in Human Behavior
AU - Phua, Joe
AU - Jin, Seunga Venus
AU - Kim, Jihoon (jay)
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/07/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 115-122
VL - 72
SN - 0747-5632
SN - 1873-7692
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2017_Phua,
author = {Joe Phua and Seunga Venus Jin and Jihoon (jay) Kim},
title = {Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat},
journal = {Computers in Human Behavior},
year = {2017},
volume = {72},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041},
pages = {115--122},
doi = {10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041}
}