volume 127 pages 383-407

Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-01-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.628
CiteScore13.2
Impact factor6.5
ISSN03608352, 18790550
General Engineering
General Computer Science
Abstract
Third-party logistics (3PL) has involved a significant response among researchers and practitioners in the recent decade. In the global competitive scenario, multinational companies (MNCs) not only improve quality of service and increase efficiency, but also decrease costs by means of 3PL. However, the assessment and selection of 3PL is a very critical decision, comprising intricacy due to the existence of various imprecisely based criteria. Also, uncertainty is an unavoidable part of the information in the decision-making process and its importance in the selection process is relatively high and needs to be carefully considered. Consequently, incomplete and inadequate data or information may occur among other various selection criteria, which can be termed as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. Interval rough numbers are very flexible to model this type of uncertainty occurring in MCDM problems. Thus this paper presents a new integrated interval rough number (IRN) approach based on the Best Worst Method (BWM) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method along Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) to evaluate 3PL providers. The hybrid IRN-BWM based methodology is used for computing the priority weights of criteria while IRN-WASPAS and IRN-MABAC are employed to achieve the final ranking of 3PL providers. A computational study is performed to illustrate the proposed approaches along with a sensitivity analysis on different sets of criteria weight coefficient values to validate the stability of the suggested methodology. Consequently, a comparative analysis of the obtained ranking results with their crisp and fuzzy counterparts is also conducted for checking the reliability of the proposed approach. The results display stability in ranking of alternative results and prove the feasibility of the proposed approach to handle MCDM problems with IRNs.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Expert Systems with Applications
8 publications, 6.02%
Computers and Industrial Engineering
8 publications, 6.02%
Information Sciences
7 publications, 5.26%
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
6 publications, 4.51%
Sustainability
6 publications, 4.51%
IEEE Access
5 publications, 3.76%
Symmetry
4 publications, 3.01%
Mathematics
4 publications, 3.01%
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems
4 publications, 3.01%
Applied Soft Computing Journal
4 publications, 3.01%
Advanced Engineering Informatics
4 publications, 3.01%
Annals of Operations Research
3 publications, 2.26%
Heliyon
3 publications, 2.26%
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
3 publications, 2.26%
Axioms
2 publications, 1.5%
Soft Computing
2 publications, 1.5%
Transportation Research, Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
2 publications, 1.5%
Journal of Cleaner Production
2 publications, 1.5%
International Journal of Production Economics
2 publications, 1.5%
Technological and Economic Development of Economy
2 publications, 1.5%
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
2 publications, 1.5%
International Journal of Strategic Property Management
2 publications, 1.5%
Journal of Modelling in Management
2 publications, 1.5%
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
1 publication, 0.75%
Kybernetes
1 publication, 0.75%
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment
1 publication, 0.75%
Management Decision
1 publication, 0.75%
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
1 publication, 0.75%
Energies
1 publication, 0.75%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
Elsevier
56 publications, 42.11%
Springer Nature
22 publications, 16.54%
MDPI
18 publications, 13.53%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
7 publications, 5.26%
Emerald
6 publications, 4.51%
IOS Press
6 publications, 4.51%
Taylor & Francis
5 publications, 3.76%
Hindawi Limited
4 publications, 3.01%
SAGE
2 publications, 1.5%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.75%
Wiley
1 publication, 0.75%
IGI Global
1 publication, 0.75%
UUM Press, Universiti Utara Malaysia
1 publication, 0.75%
King Saud University
1 publication, 0.75%
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
1 publication, 0.75%
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Universitesi SBE Dergisi
1 publication, 0.75%
10
20
30
40
50
60
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
133
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Pamucar D., Chatterjee K., Zavadskas E. K. Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers // Computers and Industrial Engineering. 2019. Vol. 127. pp. 383-407.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Pamucar D., Chatterjee K., Zavadskas E. K. Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers // Computers and Industrial Engineering. 2019. Vol. 127. pp. 383-407.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.023
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.023
TI - Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers
T2 - Computers and Industrial Engineering
AU - Pamucar, Dragan
AU - Chatterjee, Kajal
AU - Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/01/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 383-407
VL - 127
SN - 0360-8352
SN - 1879-0550
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2019_Pamucar,
author = {Dragan Pamucar and Kajal Chatterjee and Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas},
title = {Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers},
journal = {Computers and Industrial Engineering},
year = {2019},
volume = {127},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.023},
pages = {383--407},
doi = {10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.023}
}