Nanoenergetics as pressure generator for nontoxic impact primers: Comparison of Al/Bi2O3, Al/CuO, Al/MoO3 nanothermites and Al/PTFE
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2015-05-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 2.015
CiteScore: 10.9
Impact factor: 6.2
ISSN: 00102180, 15562921
General Chemistry
General Chemical Engineering
General Physics and Astronomy
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Abstract
In the last two decades, major progresses have been made in developing highly-exothermic reactive mixtures. Mixtures of metallic and oxide powders, so-called nanothermites have been used to release temperature, pressure waves and eventually new compounds through exothermic reactions. By varying the size and nature of the oxidizer, we can tune the performances of these materials and multiply the applications. For application in nanothermite-based impact primers, it is important to generate a high pressure peak with a pressurization rate as high as possible to accelerate a thin plastic or metallic foil to a few hundreds of meter per second. This paper reports on the burning rate performances and over-pressure generation for 4 kinds of nanothermite powder mixtures prepared using aluminum nanoparticles mixed with 3 different nano-sized oxidizers, Bi2O3, CuO, MoO3 and micron-sized PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene) and compare them to Al/CuO multilayer nanothermite. We observe that Al/Oxide reactions are very luminous with an unconfined burning rate spanning from 65 to 420 m/s. The maximum value has been obtained for Al/Bi2O3 powder mixture. Al/CuO mixture generates the highest pressure peak (41.7 MPa) at 50% TMD (Theoretical Maximum Density). The maximum pressurization rate is also measured for this Al/Bi2O3 mixture (∼5762 kPa/μs) at 30% TMD comparatively higher than the others: 172, 35 and 33 kPa/μs for Al/CuO, Al/MoO3 and Al/PTFE respectively. The shortest time needed to reach maximal pressure is obtained for Al/Bi2O3 with 225 μs. It is of 360 μs for Al/MoO3, 770 μs for Al/CuO and 1040 μs for Al/PTFE. So there is a difference of performance. Burning rates follow the same tendency: the highest velocity is obtained for Al/Bi2O3, and slowest for Al/PTFE. So the faster reaction results in a reduced ignition delay.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
|
Combustion and Flame
18 publications, 9.73%
|
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
16 publications, 8.65%
|
|
|
Defence Technology
7 publications, 3.78%
|
|
|
Materials and Design
7 publications, 3.78%
|
|
|
Materials
6 publications, 3.24%
|
|
|
Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics
5 publications, 2.7%
|
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
4 publications, 2.16%
|
|
|
Vacuum
4 publications, 2.16%
|
|
|
RSC Advances
4 publications, 2.16%
|
|
|
Polymers
3 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
Micromachines
3 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
Ceramics International
3 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
Thermochimica Acta
3 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
Applied Surface Science
3 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
ACS Applied Nano Materials
3 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
Combustion Science and Technology
3 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
3 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
Metals
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Molecules
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Nanoscale Research Letters
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Advanced Powder Technology
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Nanotechnology
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Surface and Coatings Technology
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Chemical Engineering Science
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Advanced Materials
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
ACS Omega
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
|
Elsevier
91 publications, 49.19%
|
|
|
MDPI
22 publications, 11.89%
|
|
|
Wiley
15 publications, 8.11%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
12 publications, 6.49%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
10 publications, 5.41%
|
|
|
IOP Publishing
8 publications, 4.32%
|
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
6 publications, 3.24%
|
|
|
AIP Publishing
5 publications, 2.7%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
5 publications, 2.7%
|
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
185
Total citations:
185
Citations from 2024:
37
(20%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Glavier L. et al. Nanoenergetics as pressure generator for nontoxic impact primers: Comparison of Al/Bi2O3, Al/CuO, Al/MoO3 nanothermites and Al/PTFE // Combustion and Flame. 2015. Vol. 162. No. 5. pp. 1813-1820.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Glavier L., Taton G., Ducéré J. M., Baijot V., Pinon S., Calais T., Esteve A., Djafari Rouhani M., Rossi C. Nanoenergetics as pressure generator for nontoxic impact primers: Comparison of Al/Bi2O3, Al/CuO, Al/MoO3 nanothermites and Al/PTFE // Combustion and Flame. 2015. Vol. 162. No. 5. pp. 1813-1820.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.12.002
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.12.002
TI - Nanoenergetics as pressure generator for nontoxic impact primers: Comparison of Al/Bi2O3, Al/CuO, Al/MoO3 nanothermites and Al/PTFE
T2 - Combustion and Flame
AU - Glavier, Ludovic
AU - Taton, Guillaume
AU - Ducéré, Jean Marie
AU - Baijot, Vincent
AU - Pinon, Stéphane
AU - Calais, Théo
AU - Esteve, Alain
AU - Djafari Rouhani, Mehdi
AU - Rossi, Carole
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/05/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 1813-1820
IS - 5
VL - 162
SN - 0010-2180
SN - 1556-2921
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2015_Glavier,
author = {Ludovic Glavier and Guillaume Taton and Jean Marie Ducéré and Vincent Baijot and Stéphane Pinon and Théo Calais and Alain Esteve and Mehdi Djafari Rouhani and Carole Rossi},
title = {Nanoenergetics as pressure generator for nontoxic impact primers: Comparison of Al/Bi2O3, Al/CuO, Al/MoO3 nanothermites and Al/PTFE},
journal = {Combustion and Flame},
year = {2015},
volume = {162},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.12.002},
number = {5},
pages = {1813--1820},
doi = {10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.12.002}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Glavier, Ludovic, et al. “Nanoenergetics as pressure generator for nontoxic impact primers: Comparison of Al/Bi2O3, Al/CuO, Al/MoO3 nanothermites and Al/PTFE.” Combustion and Flame, vol. 162, no. 5, May. 2015, pp. 1813-1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.12.002.