Construction and Building Materials, volume 34, pages 372-380

Tensile characterization of basalt fiber rods and ropes: A first contribution

Enrico Quagliarini 1
Francesco Monni 1
Federica Bondioli 2
1
 
Department of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University of Marche, via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2012-09-01
scimago Q1
SJR1.999
CiteScore13.8
Impact factor7.4
ISSN09500618, 18790526
General Materials Science
Building and Construction
Civil and Structural Engineering
Abstract
► Basalt is an increasing alternative to glass, carbon or aramidic fibers in civil engineering. ► Few mechanical data of basalt products is present in literature and standard protocols are missing. ► A test protocol for tensile characterization of basalt ropes and rods is provided. ► Results confirm that basalt rods and ropes could be a good alternative to other similar products. Basalt is an emerging material, whose use is increasing in constructions and civil applications as an alternative to glass, carbon or aramidic fibers. Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) rods and Basalt Fiber (BF) ropes are going to be used as an alternative to glass, carbon or aramidic fibers for strengthening purposes but few information about their mechanical performances is present in literature and standard test protocols are missing. Thus, this work tries to provide a test protocol for tensile characterization of BF ropes and a validation of the test protocol used for tensile characterization of not-basalt-FRP rods applied on BFRP rods. This is a very important issue from an engineering standpoint in order to evaluate their applicability for architectural heritage retrofitting, as, for example, in repointing (rods), or in innovative techniques, such as the one actually still being tested in our laboratories, that is aimed to strengthen historic masonry (ropes). Experimental test results obtained are shown. Results seem to confirm that BFRP rods and BF ropes could be a good alternative to other similar products.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?