Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, volume 15, issue 9, pages 779-786

Clinical decision-making by fourth-year pharmacy students: Towards an understanding of their uncertainty

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-09-01
scimago Q2
SJR0.450
CiteScore2.1
Impact factor1.3
ISSN18771297, 18771300
Pharmacy
General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Abstract
Clinical decision-making is a critical process underpinning much of a pharmacist's daily activities. While it is known that pharmacists hesitate to make decisions, it remains unclear whether pharmacy students experience similar hesitancy. The objective of this study was to better understand the phenomenon of decision-making in pharmacy students. This study was designed from a social constructivist paradigm using qualitative case study methodology. The purpose was to investigate issues related to hesitancy in clinical decision-making by fourth-year pharmacy students. Data were collected through observation of students engaging in simulations, post-simulation interviews, and written reflections. Data analysis included multiple stages of coding, followed by pattern identification and discovery of interrelationships. The primary themes relating to issues in pharmacy student clinical decision-making were relational factors, teaching and learning, degree of certainty, and personal characteristics. Relational factors include elements of relationships with patients and physicians as well as a sense of autonomy. The theme of teaching and learning included the sub-themes of formal education and learning in the real world. Degree of certainty included patient complexity, weighing risks and benefits, comfort in ambiguity, and a lack of information. Finally, personal characteristics associated with decision-making include personal experiences, leadership skills, and confidence. Pharmacy education needs to focus on ensuring preceptors can help model comfort in ambiguity, that assessments include the reality of practice, and ensuring ample practice of decision-making in a simulated environment.

Top-30

Journals

1
1

Publishers

1
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?