volume 174 pages 308-321

Automatic determination of LQR weighting matrices for active structural control

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-11-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.803
CiteScore11.2
Impact factor6.4
ISSN01410296, 18737323
Civil and Structural Engineering
Abstract
This paper presents a method for the automatic selection of weighting matrices for a linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) in order to design an optimal active structural control system. The weighting matrices of a control performance index, which are used to design optimal state-feedback gains, are usually determined by rule of thumb or exhaustive search approaches. To explore an easy way to select optimal parameters, this paper presents a method based on Bayesian optimization (BO). A 10-degree-of-freedom (DOF) shear building model that has passive-base isolation (PBI) under the building is used as an example to explain the method. A control performance index that contains the absolute acceleration, along with the inter-story drift and velocity of each story, is chosen for the design of the controller. An objective function that contains the maximum absolute acceleration of the building is chosen for BO to produce optimal weighting matrices. In the numerical example, a restriction on the displacement of the PBI is used as a constraint for the selection of weighting matrices. First, the BO method is compared to the exhaustive search method using two parameters in the weighting matrices to illustrate the validity of the BO method. Then, thirty-three parameters (which are automatically optimized by the BO method) in the weighting matrices are used to elaborately tune the controller. The control results are compared to those for the exhaustive search method and conventional optimal control, in terms of the control performance of the relative displacement, absolute acceleration, inter-story-drift angle, and the story-shear coefficient of each story. The damping ratio for each mode, and the control energy and power are also compared. The comparison demonstrates the validity of the method.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
Engineering Structures
6 publications, 17.14%
JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control
2 publications, 5.71%
Actuators
2 publications, 5.71%
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Vibrational Engineering and Technologies
1 publication, 2.86%
International Journal of Dynamics and Control
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
1 publication, 2.86%
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
1 publication, 2.86%
International Journal of Systems Science
1 publication, 2.86%
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
1 publication, 2.86%
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
1 publication, 2.86%
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
1 publication, 2.86%
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
1 publication, 2.86%
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Engineering Mechanics - ASCE
1 publication, 2.86%
Structures
1 publication, 2.86%
Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Building Engineering
1 publication, 2.86%
IEEE Access
1 publication, 2.86%
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control
1 publication, 2.86%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
Elsevier
10 publications, 28.57%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 publications, 17.14%
Springer Nature
5 publications, 14.29%
MDPI
3 publications, 8.57%
Wiley
3 publications, 8.57%
SAGE
2 publications, 5.71%
ASME International
1 publication, 2.86%
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
1 publication, 2.86%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 2.86%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 2.86%
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 publication, 2.86%
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
1 publication, 2.86%
2
4
6
8
10
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
35
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
MIYAMOTO K. et al. Automatic determination of LQR weighting matrices for active structural control // Engineering Structures. 2018. Vol. 174. pp. 308-321.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
MIYAMOTO K., She J., Sato D., Yasuo N. Automatic determination of LQR weighting matrices for active structural control // Engineering Structures. 2018. Vol. 174. pp. 308-321.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.009
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.009
TI - Automatic determination of LQR weighting matrices for active structural control
T2 - Engineering Structures
AU - MIYAMOTO, Kou
AU - She, Jinhua
AU - Sato, Daiki
AU - Yasuo, Nobuaki
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/11/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 308-321
VL - 174
SN - 0141-0296
SN - 1873-7323
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2018_MIYAMOTO,
author = {Kou MIYAMOTO and Jinhua She and Daiki Sato and Nobuaki Yasuo},
title = {Automatic determination of LQR weighting matrices for active structural control},
journal = {Engineering Structures},
year = {2018},
volume = {174},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.009},
pages = {308--321},
doi = {10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.009}
}