Probabilistic demand models and fragilities for reinforced concrete frame structures subject to mainshock-aftershock sequences
3
Global Atlantic Financial Group, 4 World Trade Center, New York, NY 10007, United States
|
5
Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education
7
Harbin 150090 China
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2021-10-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.803
CiteScore: 11.2
Impact factor: 6.4
ISSN: 01410296, 18737323
Civil and Structural Engineering
Abstract
• A bivariable function considering both mainshock and aftershock intensity measures is used to develop demand model. • A Bayesian approach is used to calibrate demand models. • The Gardoni bounds is used to quantify the variability in the fragility estimates. • The uncertainties in the seismic fragility estimates are quantified. This paper presents a formulation for developing seismic demand models and estimating fragilities for reinforced concrete (RC) structures under mainshocks (MSs) only and mainshock-aftershock (MS-AS) sequences. The demand model for the MS only is a function of the MS intensity, while the model for the MS-AS sequence is a function of two variables, one describing the MS and one describing the AS. A Bayesian method is used to calibrate the demand models. The demand models are then used to estimate the fragility of RC structures. Predictive fragility curves are developed to include the uncertainties in the model parameters estimated by Bayesian approach, and confidence bounds of the fragility curves are developed to separate the effects of the uncertainty in the model parameters from the other sources of uncertainties. The proposed formulation is illustrated using a typical five-story RC frame building. The results show that the fragility curves for MS only tend to significantly underestimate the fragility curves for MS-AS sequences. Also, the uncertainty in the fragilities for the MS-AS sequence is, as expected, larger than that considering only the MS.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
|
Structures
8 publications, 17.02%
|
|
|
Engineering Structures
5 publications, 10.64%
|
|
|
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
4 publications, 8.51%
|
|
|
Journal of Building Engineering
4 publications, 8.51%
|
|
|
Buildings
3 publications, 6.38%
|
|
|
Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings
3 publications, 6.38%
|
|
|
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
3 publications, 6.38%
|
|
|
Results in Engineering
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
|
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
|
Ocean Engineering
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Built Environment
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Journal of Earthquake Engineering
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Progress in Nuclear Energy
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Journal of Structural Engineering
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Earthquake Engineering and Resilience
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishers
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
|
Elsevier
31 publications, 65.96%
|
|
|
Wiley
6 publications, 12.77%
|
|
|
MDPI
4 publications, 8.51%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
3 publications, 6.38%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
47
Total citations:
47
Citations from 2024:
29
(61.71%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Zhou Z. et al. Probabilistic demand models and fragilities for reinforced concrete frame structures subject to mainshock-aftershock sequences // Engineering Structures. 2021. Vol. 245. p. 112904.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Zhou Z., Xu H., Gardoni P., Lu D., Yu X. Probabilistic demand models and fragilities for reinforced concrete frame structures subject to mainshock-aftershock sequences // Engineering Structures. 2021. Vol. 245. p. 112904.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112904
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112904
TI - Probabilistic demand models and fragilities for reinforced concrete frame structures subject to mainshock-aftershock sequences
T2 - Engineering Structures
AU - Zhou, Zhou
AU - Xu, Hao
AU - Gardoni, Paolo
AU - Lu, Dagang
AU - Yu, Xiao-Hui
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/10/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 112904
VL - 245
SN - 0141-0296
SN - 1873-7323
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2021_Zhou,
author = {Zhou Zhou and Hao Xu and Paolo Gardoni and Dagang Lu and Xiao-Hui Yu},
title = {Probabilistic demand models and fragilities for reinforced concrete frame structures subject to mainshock-aftershock sequences},
journal = {Engineering Structures},
year = {2021},
volume = {245},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {oct},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112904},
pages = {112904},
doi = {10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112904}
}