Assessment of Clinical Pregnancies in Up to Eight Ovarian Stimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Cycles in Those Unable to Proceed With In Vitro Fertilization
M. Blake Evans
1
,
Pardis Hosseinzadeh
2
,
Kerry Flannagan
3
,
Kerry S. Flannagan
4
,
Samad Jahandideh
3, 4
,
Emilie Burruss
5, 6
,
Jennifer Peck
7
,
Karl E. Hansen
7
,
Karl R. Hansen
7
,
Micah Hill
8
,
Micah J. Hill
8
,
Kate Devine
4
3
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland; Shady Grove Fertility, Washington, District of Columbia.
|
4
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland; Shady Grove Fertility, Washington, D.C.
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2024-07-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 2.028
CiteScore: 11.6
Impact factor: 7.0
ISSN: 00150282, 15565653
PubMed ID:
38365110
Reproductive Medicine
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To study the primary objective of clinical pregnancy rate per ovarian stimulation intrauterine insemination cycle in patients with repetitive cycles up to a maximum of 8 cycles.DESIGN
Retrospective cohort.SETTING
Large fertility clinic.PATIENTS
A total of 37,565 consecutive ovarian stimulation intrauterine insemination cycles from 18,509 patients were included in this study.INTERVENTIONS
Those with anovulatory diagnoses, tubal factor infertility, male factor infertility, using donor sperm, canceled cycles, and those with missing data for either baseline characteristics or outcome were excluded. Clinical pregnancy rate was analyzed by generalized estimating equations and controlled for age, stimulation protocol, and body mass index.MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S)
Clinical pregnancy was defined as intrauterine gestation with fetal heartbeat visible on ultrasound.RESULTS
A total of 37,565 consecutive ovarian stimulation intrauterine insemination cycles from 2002 through 2019 at a private practice facility were evaluated. All cycles met inclusion criteria and were used in generalized estimating equation modeling. Patients < 35 years old comprised 47.6% of the cohort. After adjustment for confounders, the mean predicted probability of clinical pregnancy for cycles 1-8 was 15.7% per cycle. The mean predicted probability of clinical pregnancy in aggregated data from cycles 2-4 was only 1.7% lower compared to cycle 1 as the referent (16.7% vs. 15.0%, 95% CI 2nd: 0.88 (0.82, 0.95), 3rd: 0.86 (0.79, 0.93), 4th: 0.88 (0.79, 0.98)). However, the 15.0% mean predicted probability of clinical pregnancy for the 2nd through 4th cycle was concordant with the mean for all included cycles (15.7%). The mean predicted probability of clinical pregnancy of cycles 5-8 was not significantly different when compared to the referent (16.7% vs. 16.1%, 95% CI 5th: 0.97 (0.85, 1.11), 6th: 0.93 (0.79, 1.10), 7th: 1.01 (0.81, 1.26), 8th: 1.01 (0.76, 1.34)). Modeling of consecutive cycles suggested that the adjusted cumulative predicted probability of clinical pregnancy from OS-IUI continues to increase with each of the eight successive cycles.CONCLUSION
Clinical pregnancy rates are satisfactory in up to 8 consecutive ovarian stimulation intrauterine insemination cycles. These data are useful for counseling, especially in those patients for whom in vitro fertilization is not financially or ethically feasible.Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Fertility and Sterility
1 publication, 50%
|
|
|
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
1 publication, 50%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 publication, 50%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 50%
|
|
|
1
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
2
Total citations:
2
Citations from 2024:
2
(100%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Evans M. B. et al. Assessment of Clinical Pregnancies in Up to Eight Ovarian Stimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Cycles in Those Unable to Proceed With In Vitro Fertilization // Fertility and Sterility. 2024. Vol. 122. No. 1. pp. 114-120.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Evans M. B., Hosseinzadeh P., Flannagan K., Flannagan K. S., Jahandideh S., Burruss E., Peck J., Hansen K. E., Hansen K. R., Hill M., Hill M. J., Devine K. Assessment of Clinical Pregnancies in Up to Eight Ovarian Stimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Cycles in Those Unable to Proceed With In Vitro Fertilization // Fertility and Sterility. 2024. Vol. 122. No. 1. pp. 114-120.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.02.018
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028224000992
TI - Assessment of Clinical Pregnancies in Up to Eight Ovarian Stimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Cycles in Those Unable to Proceed With In Vitro Fertilization
T2 - Fertility and Sterility
AU - Evans, M. Blake
AU - Hosseinzadeh, Pardis
AU - Flannagan, Kerry
AU - Flannagan, Kerry S.
AU - Jahandideh, Samad
AU - Burruss, Emilie
AU - Peck, Jennifer
AU - Hansen, Karl E.
AU - Hansen, Karl R.
AU - Hill, Micah
AU - Hill, Micah J.
AU - Devine, Kate
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/07/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 114-120
IS - 1
VL - 122
PMID - 38365110
SN - 0015-0282
SN - 1556-5653
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2024_Evans,
author = {M. Blake Evans and Pardis Hosseinzadeh and Kerry Flannagan and Kerry S. Flannagan and Samad Jahandideh and Emilie Burruss and Jennifer Peck and Karl E. Hansen and Karl R. Hansen and Micah Hill and Micah J. Hill and Kate Devine},
title = {Assessment of Clinical Pregnancies in Up to Eight Ovarian Stimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Cycles in Those Unable to Proceed With In Vitro Fertilization},
journal = {Fertility and Sterility},
year = {2024},
volume = {122},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jul},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028224000992},
number = {1},
pages = {114--120},
doi = {10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.02.018}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Evans, M. Blake, et al. “Assessment of Clinical Pregnancies in Up to Eight Ovarian Stimulation with Intrauterine Insemination Cycles in Those Unable to Proceed With In Vitro Fertilization.” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 122, no. 1, Jul. 2024, pp. 114-120. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028224000992.