International Journal of Medical Informatics, volume 186, pages 105426

Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review

Li Bingyan 1
Liu Min 1
Liu Jia 1
Zhang Yuxi 1
Yang W 1
Yang Wenjuan
Xie Lunfang 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-06-01
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor4.9
ISSN13865056, 18728243
Health Informatics
Abstract
The aims of this review are to clarify the current state of research in terms of assessment tools and assessors of the quality of health science-related short videos on TikTok, to identify limitations in existing research; and to provide a reference for future studies.A scoping review was conducted. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, and CBM databases were searched from September 2016 to November 2022. Manual searching was also performed to identify additional eligible studies. A total of 2620 documents were initially retrieved, and 29 were ultimately included. The literature was screened and collected, and data were extracted and summarized by 2 researchers.(1) The quality evaluation tools used in the 29 papers included the DISCERN, PEMAT(A/V), GQS, JAMA, HONcode, guidelines and self-developed tools. Twenty-four of the included articles used the DISCERN for quality assessment, which was the most frequently used evaluation tool. However, most of these tools were not developed to assess health science-related short videos, lacked credibility tests, and had poor applicability; therefore, the accuracy of the evaluation results might be biased. (2) The assessors of the quality of health science-related short videos on TikTok were mainly experts in related fields and medical students, with doctors (12/14) being the most common evaluators. Fifteen studies did not report the identity of the evaluators, and 12 studies did not report interrater reliability.This scoping review found that there is a lack of specific quality assessment tools for health science-related short videos on TikTok. Second, the current quality assessors of health science-related short videos on TikTok are limited. Future research should focus on the development of reliable, scientific quality assessment tools for health science-related short videos; unifying the evaluation standards; inviting users with different backgrounds and different health literacy levels to conduct quality assessments; exploring the quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok from different perspectives.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Li B. et al. Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review // International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2024. Vol. 186. p. 105426.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Li B., Liu M., Liu J., Zhang Y., Yang W., Yang W., Xie L. Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review // International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2024. Vol. 186. p. 105426.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426
TI - Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review
T2 - International Journal of Medical Informatics
AU - Li, Bingyan
AU - Liu, Min
AU - Liu, Jia
AU - Zhang, Yuxi
AU - Yang, W
AU - Xie, Lunfang
AU - Yang, Wenjuan
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/06/01 00:00:00
PB - Elsevier
SP - 105426
VL - 186
SN - 1386-5056
SN - 1872-8243
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2024_Li,
author = {Bingyan Li and Min Liu and Jia Liu and Yuxi Zhang and W Yang and Lunfang Xie and Wenjuan Yang},
title = {Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review},
journal = {International Journal of Medical Informatics},
year = {2024},
volume = {186},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426},
pages = {105426},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426}
}
Found error?
Profiles