Journal of Crystal Growth, volume 374, pages 79-87
Comparative study of (Z)-4-oxo-4-ureido-but-2-enoic acid and p-toluenesulfonic acid 3-nitrophenyl ester by crystal engineering and DFT calculation
Yun-Feng Zhang
1, 2
,
Liang Huang
2
,
Y B Sun
3
,
Bo Han
2
,
Hansong Cheng
1, 2
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2013-07-01
Journal:
Journal of Crystal Growth
scimago Q2
wos Q3
SJR: 0.379
CiteScore: 3.6
Impact factor: 1.7
ISSN: 00220248, 18735002
Materials Chemistry
Inorganic Chemistry
Condensed Matter Physics
Abstract
A1. Crystal structure A1. DFT calculation A1. Hydrogen bond B1. Sulfonic acid ester B1. (Z)-4-oxo-4-ureido-but-2-enoic acid abstract In this work, we reported on the synthesis and characterization of (Z)-4-oxo-4-ureido-but-2-enoic acid and p-toluenesulfonic acid 3-nitrophenyl ester and their detailed crystal structure information were studied. The crystallization of (Z)-4-oxo-4-ureido-but-2-enoic acid results in reduced π-conjugation in the molecule and weaker intra-molecular hydrogen bonding. The main driving force for the molecular self-assembly of (Z)-4-oxo-4-ureido-but-2-enoic acid was found to be the strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Compared with (Z)-4-oxo-4-ureido-but-2-enoic acid with six type of strong H-bonds, p-toluenesulfonic acid 3-nitrophenyl ester possesses much lower melting point (110-1111C), average packing energy (−3.7 kcal mol −1 ), molecular deformation energy (−0.6 kcal mol −1 ) and highest torsional angle change (9.31). This can be ascribed to the week intermolecular interaction between center molecule and adjacent molecules.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.