Open Access
Open access
volume 123 pages 104181

CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-08-01
scimago Q3
wos Q1
SJR0.332
CiteScore1.4
Impact factor5.5
ISSN03005712, 23456485, 23456418, 1879176X
General Dentistry
Abstract
• 3D printed model using a polymeric material was an alternative to traditional waxing. • CAD/CAM milled crowns showed greater gap in the occlusal region than the press group. • CAD/CAM milled and 3D printed/press ceramic crowns had similar fatigue behavior. • The radial crack was the most frequent failure mode after fatigue loading. this study aimed to evaluate the adaptation and fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) monolithic crowns produced by press (combined with 3D-printing) and CAD/CAM milling (control) techniques. thirty abutment preparations with a chamfer finish line were produced with a dentin analogue material and scanned with extraoral scanner. Captured images were processed using CAD software to design a premolar. Blocks of LD were milled using CAD/CAM system. For the press technique, crowns were first 3D-printed using a polymeric material and the heat-pressing protocol was performed. Crowns were adhesively cemented to the abutments and scanned using micro-CT. Files were processed and cross-sectional images were analysed in five measuring points: marginal, axial angle, axial, occlusal angle and occlusal. Fatigue test was performed in a MTS universal testing machine (2 Hz, 37°C distilled water) using an anatomic composite piston, following the step-stress method. Failures were detected with an acoustic system and confirmed by transillumination. A cumulative damage-Weibull distribution (95% CI) was used to analyze the fatigue data. Gap thickness data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (α=0.05). CAD/CAM milling resulted in larger gap thickness in the occlusal area and smaller gap thickness in the axial angle and axial area than press (p<0.05). The probability of failure was similar for crowns produced with CAD/CAM milling and press. The most frequent failure mode was radial crack. LD crowns produced using the combination of 3D-printing/press technique showed similar fatigue behavior than CAD/CAM milled control group, and resulted in smaller gap thickness at the occlusal region. A more controlled process can be achieved by replacing conventional restoration waxing with 3D printing, which in combination with the press technique produces lithium disilicate glass-ceramic monolithic crowns with good adaptation and high fatigue survival.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
Clinical Oral Investigations
2 publications, 10.53%
Polymers
2 publications, 10.53%
Materials
2 publications, 10.53%
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
1 publication, 5.26%
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
1 publication, 5.26%
Diagnostics
1 publication, 5.26%
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
1 publication, 5.26%
BMC Oral Health
1 publication, 5.26%
Biomimetics
1 publication, 5.26%
Coatings
1 publication, 5.26%
Advances in Applied Ceramics
1 publication, 5.26%
Journal of Dentistry
1 publication, 5.26%
Dental Materials
1 publication, 5.26%
Journal of Prosthodontic Research
1 publication, 5.26%
Journal of Dental Education
1 publication, 5.26%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 publication, 5.26%
1
2

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MDPI
9 publications, 47.37%
Springer Nature
3 publications, 15.79%
Elsevier
3 publications, 15.79%
Wiley
2 publications, 10.53%
SAGE
1 publication, 5.26%
Japan Prosthodontic Society
1 publication, 5.26%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
19
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Ottoni R. et al. CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior // Journal of Dentistry. 2022. Vol. 123. p. 104181.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Ottoni R., Marocho S. M. S., Griggs J. A., Borba M. CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior // Journal of Dentistry. 2022. Vol. 123. p. 104181.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104181
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104181
TI - CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior
T2 - Journal of Dentistry
AU - Ottoni, R
AU - Marocho, Susana M Salazar
AU - Griggs, J A
AU - Borba, Marcia
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/08/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 104181
VL - 123
PMID - 35679990
SN - 0300-5712
SN - 2345-6485
SN - 2345-6418
SN - 1879-176X
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Ottoni,
author = {R Ottoni and Susana M Salazar Marocho and J A Griggs and Marcia Borba},
title = {CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior},
journal = {Journal of Dentistry},
year = {2022},
volume = {123},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104181},
pages = {104181},
doi = {10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104181}
}